|
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS
REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2000
Meeting was called to order
at 9:08 a.m.
Present: Supervisors Dianne Jacob, Chairwoman; Ron Roberts, Vice Chairman;
Greg Cox; Pam Slater; and Bill Horn; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.
Approval of Statement of
Proceedings/Minutes for meeting of October 18, 2000.
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the
Board of Supervisors
approved the minutes for the meeting of October 18, 2000.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
Board
of Supervisors' Agenda Items
|
1.
|
REPORT ON POTENTIAL IMPACTS
OF TRIBAL GAMING ON SAN DIEGO COUNTY
|
|
2.
|
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM SUBAREA PLAN ANNUAL HABITAT
TRACKING REPORT 1999
|
|
3.
|
TRANSFER OF SOLID WASTE
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
[FUNDING SOURCES: SOLID
WASTE TONNAGE FEES; TIRE RECYCLING PUBLIC EDUCATION & AMNESTY
GRANT; CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER AND RECYCLING GRANT; USED
OIL BLOCK FIVE GRANT; USED OIL BLOCK SIX GRANT AND THE LAND USE
AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP MANAGEMENT RESERVES.
(4 VOTES)
|
|
4.
|
FINAL REPORT ON THE REGIONALIZATION
OF THE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM
|
|
5.
|
APPLICATION FOR AND ACCEPTANCE
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION GRANTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02
|
|
6.
|
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR ON-SITE AIRPORT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR BORREGO VALLEY AIRPORT
[FUNDING SOURCE: AIRPORT
ENTERPRISE FUND]
|
|
7.
|
SUNSET REVIEW OF BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS POLICIES, COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES,
AND ADMINISTRATIVE CODES ASSIGNED TO DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE LAND
USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP, AND ANIMAL CONTROL
(RELATES TO SANITATION DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM NO.
1)
|
|
8.
|
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:
NEW APPOINTMENTS TO THE
COUNTY’S SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD AND SUNSET ADVISORY BOARD
|
|
9.
|
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT
TO JOINT AGREEMENT (SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES), AND EXTENSION OF
TIME TO COMPLETE IMPROVEMENTS, FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT NO.
4744-1, FINAL MAP 13602, LOCATED IN HIDDEN MEADOWS SPONSOR GROUP
AREA
|
|
10.
|
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT
TO JOINT AGREEMENT (SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES), FOR COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO TRACT NO. 4863-1, FINAL MAP 13774, LOCATED IN VALLE DE ORO
PLANNING AREA
|
|
11.
|
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:
APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP
AND SECURED AGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS FOR COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO TRACT NO. 5115-1, LOCATED IN THE VALLE DE ORO COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREA
|
|
12.
|
AMENDMENT TO CONSULTNT
CONTRCT FOR GENERAL PLAN 2020
(CARRYOVER ITEM FROM
10/25/00, AGENDA ITEM NO. 13)
(4 VOTES)
|
|
13.
|
FUNDING FOR ACQUISITION
OF RAMONA GRASSLANDS
|
|
14.
|
SUPPORTING FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE ELECTRICITY
RATE RELIEF
(CARRYOVER ITEM FROM
10/31/2000, AGENDA NO. 25)
|
|
15.
|
CLOSED SESSION
(CARRYOVER ITEM FROM
10/31/2000, AGENDA NO. 20)
|
|
16.
|
PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS
|
|
17.
|
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
|
1. SUBJECT: REPORT
ON POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF TRIBAL GAMING ON SAN DIEGO COUNTY
(Supv. Dist: 2,5)
OVERVIEW:
In response
to concerns arising from the rapid development of Class III gaming facilities
on tribal lands, and the potential for significant impacts to County
of San Diego resources, on August 1, 2000 (17), the County Board of
Supervisors approved an initiative proposed by Supervisor Bill Horn,
and amended by Supervisor Dianne Jacob, to direct the Chief Administrative
Officer to conduct a comprehensive review of potential impacts of the
planned casinos on traffic, the environment, public safety and health,
and business development. In response to this direction, County staff
has prepared this report, which presents analyses of the potential impacts
of Tribal gaming on Northern and Eastern San Diego County. The report
also identifies information, which would be needed to allow for a complete
assessment of potential impacts.
The
impacts of gaming facilities will definitely be significant on County
and State roads and highways. Additionally, impacts to air quality,
noise, community character, biology, and other resources are likely
to be significant, although the extent of the impacts cannot be determined
based on the information available at this time. Mitigating these impacts
will require cooperation from the Tribes as the County’s regulations,
and ordinances that require projects to provide protection for natural
resources and the environment do not apply on Tribal lands.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of improving
County roads to adequately serve gaming facilities will be very significant.
It is estimated that the County’s costs will be at minimum $168 million.
These costs could increase significantly based on more detailed studies.
There is no identified source of funding to fund such costs.
To
date, staff has incurred $95,200 in non-budgeted costs related to Tribal
gaming issues. Some of these costs can be attributed to specific gaming
projects, and some of the costs were incurred to address general issues,
preparing materials for the Board Conference and this report. Additionally,
it is anticipated that staff will incur $151,000 to $201,000 in additional
costs for the remainder of this fiscal year.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
The
full extent of business impacts is unknown at this time, however, businesses
that provide services and supplies to the gaming Tribes stand to benefit,
while other businesses may lose revenues to similar competing businesses
in the gaming facilities .
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1. Request the
Board Sub-Committee to begin discussions with the various Tribes to
develop a strategy that would allow the County to obtain adequate information
needed in order to assess project-specific impacts to County jurisdictional
lands and resources, and determine and implement appropriate mitigation
for those impacts.
8. Direct the
Chief Administrative Officer to provide a schedule within 30 days for
performance of operational assessments of road segments that will be
substantially impacted by the new casino projects and casino expansion
projects. The assessments are to identify minor repairs and improvements
that can be accomplished before May 15, 2001 to prepare the roads as
much as feasibly possible for the expected traffic increases.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board of
Supervisors took action as recommended; adding the following: direct
the Chief Administrative Officer to send copies of the report to the
Tribes, allowing reasonable time for response; incorporating such response
and any additional information into this report; direct the Chief Administrative
Officer to incorporate into the report the potential impact of the Casinos
activities into the General Plan 2020 process; direct the Chief Administrative
Officer to incorporate the build-up of the communities off the Reservations
on the road projections into the General Plan 2020 process; direct Chief
Administrative Officer to update this report at least every six months
and to send a copy of this report and the on-going updates to State
and Federal representatives in the region, including the State Attorney
General, the Governor and the National Indian Gaming Commission; directed
the Board of Supervisors to draft a letter to the Bureau of Indian Affairs,
the Attorney General, Department of Interior and others that might be
appropriate, stating the Board of Supervisors opposition to annexing
additional lands into Reservations and thus receiving the trust status.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
2. SUBJECT:
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM SUBAREA
PLAN ANNUAL HABITAT TRACKING REPORT 1999
(Supv. Dist: All)
OVERVIEW:
The County
Board of Supervisors adopted the County of San Diego’s Subarea Plan
for the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) on October 22,
1997. One of the specific responsibilities of the County of San Diego
is to prepare an Annual Report accounting for all of the habitat that
was conserved and lost due to discretionary and certain ministerial
approvals as well as land acquisitions for conservation purposes.
The
1999 Annual Report was completed September 1, 2000. The report summarizes
take and conservation within the three segments, the Lake Hodges, South
County, and Metro-Lakeside-Jamul Segments of the Subarea Plan. During
the 1999 reporting phase, the County conserved 3,905.40 acres of habitat
within the preserve area and authorized the loss of 419.40 acres of
habitat. The County also obtained open space over 1,382.8 acres of
land outside the preserve boundaries for a total of 5,288.2 acres of
land. A portion of these 1,382.8 acres includes land acquired by the
County, State and Federal Agencies. The County of San Diego was responsible
for the direct purchase of 198.02 acres of the 5,288.2 acres of land
preserved in 1999.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
Adoption
of the MSCP allows for a streamlined process for local landowners and
eliminates the need for several duplicative permits required by other
resource agencies with permit authority over natural resources such
as sensitive species and habitats.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
Receive
the 1999 Annual Report.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
3. SUBJECT:
TRANSFER OF SOLID WASTE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS FROM THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
(Supv. Dist: All)
OVERVIEW:
On
November 4, 1997 (53), as part of the County’s divestiture of County-owned
and operated solid waste and landfill systems, the Board approved transfer
of responsibility for the following functions from the Department of
Public Works to the Department of Environmental Health: state-mandated
solid waste reduction; recycling; household hazardous waste disposal;
management of hauler agreements for the unincorporated County; and countywide
solid waste planning and reporting.
A
management review has determined that solid waste planning and management
functions currently assigned to the Department of Environmental Health
should be transferred from the Department, except for the Household
Hazardous Waste program. It is proposed that the Department of Public
Works take over responsibility and authority for these functions effective
January 1, 2001. The Department of Public Works has agreed to assume
these functions.
Board
of Supervisors action is requested to approve: (1) transfer of countywide
solid waste planning and management functions from the Department of
Environmental Health to the Department of Public Works; (2) amendments
to the County Code of Regulatory Ordinances as needed to accomplish
transfer of functions, authority and responsibility; and (3) transfer
of five positions (five staff years) from the Department of Environmental
Health to the Department of Public Works. The transfer of positions
will become operative on December 29, 2000, because that day is the
beginning of a pay period. Transfer of these functions, authority,
responsibility and positions to the Department of Public Works will
result in a solid waste organizational structure consistent with how
these functions are managed statewide.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for this request
are budgeted in the Department of Environmental Health and the Land
Use and Environment Group. The funding sources are: the Solid Waste
Tonnage Fees; Tire Recycling Public Education & Amnesty Grant; California
Beverage Container and Recycling Grant; Used Oil Block Five Grant; Used
Oil Block Six Grant and the Land Use and Environment Group Management
Reserves. If approved, this action will cancel $136,539 in Salaries
and Benefits appropriations, $336,285 in Services and Supplies appropriations
and $472,824 in budgeted revenue in the Department of Environmental
Health and establish those appropriations/revenues in the Department
of Public Works. This action also transfers five (5) full-time equivalent
(FTE) positions from the Department of Environmental Health to the Department
of Public Works. These appropriations and revenues comprise 50% of
the budgeted direct costs and revenues for the Waste Management Prevention
and Planning Program less funding for the Household Hazardous Waste
Program, which will be retained by the Department of Environmental Health.
If adjustments are necessary once actual cost and revenue information
has been received, then appropriations and/or revenue will be transferred
between Departments at Third Quarter Fund Balance.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not Applicable.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1.
In accordance with section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, find that it can be seen with certainty
that there is no possibility this action may have a significant effect
on the environment and that it is therefore not subject to CEQA.
2. Read
title and waive further reading of the following Ordinance and introduce
the Ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption on November
15, 2000:
AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REPEALING PORTIONS OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE
OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO THE TRANSFER OF SPECIFIED COUNTY
SOLID WASTE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.
This Ordinance will become operative on January
1, 2001.
3.
Read title and waive further reading of the following
Ordinance and introduce the Ordinance for further Board consideration
and adoption on November 15, 2000:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 455(f) OF THE SAN DIEGO
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO INACTIVE WASTE SITE MANAGEMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.
This Ordinance will become operative on January 1, 2001.
4. Authorize the transfer of five
(5) positions (5 staff years) from the Department of Environmental
Health to the Department of Public Works. Read title and waive further
reading of the following Ordinance and introduce the Ordinance for further
Board consideration and adoption on November 15, 2000:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
PORTIONS OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY COMPENSATION ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING
THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS, IN SPECIFIED CLASSES AND TITLE ONLY,
IN THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENTS:
6200 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH
5480 Recycling Specialist II 0
5481 Recycling Specialist I 0
2377
Waste Management Coordinator 0
5710 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
5480
Recycling Specialist II 2
5481 Recycling Specialist I 2
2377
Waste Management Coordinator 1
This Ordinance
will become operative on December 29, 2000.
5. Authorize and cancel appropriations
of $472,824 (Salaries and Benefits, $136,539, Services and Supplies,
$336,285) and budgeted revenues of $472,824 in the Department of Environmental
Health (Fund 100100, Org 6230) due to the transfer of the solid waste
planning and management functions to the Department of Public Works
effective January 1, 2001.
6. Authorize and establish
appropriations of $472,824 (Salaries and Benefits, $136,539, Services
and Supplies, $336,285) and related revenues of $472,824 in the Department
of Public Works (Fund 130000, Org 5715) to implement the shift of responsibility
for solid waste planning and management functions as of January 1, 2001.
(4 VOTES)
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, introducing Ordinances
for further consideration on November 15, 2000.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
4. SUBJECT:
FINAL REPORT ON THE REGIONALIZATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
PROGRAM
(Supv. Dist: All)
OVERVIEW:
On
March 23, 1999 (18), Supervisor Jacob and Supervisor Cox recommended
designating a subcommittee consisting of Supervisor Jacob and Supervisor
Cox to work with cities and industry to develop a regional Household
Hazardous Waste Program. In June of 1999, Supervisor Jacob and Supervisor
Cox created a Steering Committee to oversee this process. Under state
law, each jurisdiction is responsible for preparing and implementing
a Household Hazardous Waste Element as part of the County-wide Integrated
Waste Management Plan. Regionalization of the Household Hazardous Waste
Collection Program is being studied because regional cooperation leads
to greater convenience to residents, provides economies of scale and
ultimately increases the proper disposal of home-generated toxic products.
Under
the direction of the Steering Committee, a Technical Work Group was
formed to discuss the Household Hazardous Waste issues and make recommendations
to re-establish regional coordination of the programs. The Technical
Work Group held its final meeting on May 4, 2000, with the Solid Waste
Technical Advisory Committee and Citizens Advisory Committee, and produced
a final report to submit to the Steering Committee. The document was
presented to the Steering Committee for their review on May 30, 2000,
for discussion and approval prior to presenting the report to the Board
of Supervisors.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If
approved, this request will result in no additional costs or staff years.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
Improved
regional coordination of Household Hazardous Waste program activities
may lead to additional disposal opportunities and lower hazardous waste
disposal costs for small businesses classified as “Conditionally Exempt
Small Quantity Generators.” Some of the jurisdictions operating Public
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facilities have been considering
allowing these small businesses that generate less than 100 kilograms
of hazardous waste per month to dispose of their waste at the facilities
for a reduced cost.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1. Receive the
final report on Household Hazardous Waste Program Regionalization and
Coordination submitted by the Technical Work Group Subcommittee.
2. Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to continue to work
with cities to establish a region-wide public education and outreach
program pertaining to Household Hazardous Waste collection.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
5. SUBJECT:
APPLICATION FOR AND ACCEPTANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL
EDUCATION GRANTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02
(Supv. Dist: All)
OVERVIEW:
The
Department of Environmental Health requests Board authorization to apply
to the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the Fiscal
Year 2001-02 Environmental Education Grants, and to accept grant funds,
if awarded. Approval of this request authorizes the Director of the
Department of Environmental Health to execute all necessary applications
for the Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Education Grants
Program, Fiscal Year 2001-02; to supplement the existing education and
outreach budgets; and, if grant funds are awarded, to execute any agreements
necessary with the Environmental Protection Agency regarding the acceptance
of this grant.
The
grant funds would benefit the public by increasing youth awareness and
understanding of environmental issues and helping to build respect for
the environment via school curricula. Funding would be used to expand
the School to Career Program, which the Department of Environmental
Health has created for under-represented students at area high schools.
Funding would also be used to acquire and incorporate an interactive
CD ROM, designed to teach children about environmental issues, into
elementary school outreach programs.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact
in the current fiscal year. If approved, the grant will result in an
estimated $30,000 in revenue to be received in FY01-02, and will be
used to offset expenditures made during that fiscal year. The revenue
and appropriations for this request will be included in the budget for
FY01-02. The grant amounts requested total $30,000 ($10,000 each for
up to three proposed projects) with a County matching contribution of
$10,000 (25% of the total direct cost of $40,000). Only direct costs
will be reimbursed; therefore, departmental and external overhead costs
of $2,970 cannot be charged against the grant. The County matching
contribution of 25% is currently funded. If approved, there will be
$7,030 net General Fund costs from direct expenses associated with this
action and it will require the addition of 0 staff years.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not
Applicable.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1. In accordance
with Section 15061(b)(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) guidelines, find that it can be seen with certainty that
there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant
effect on the environment and that it is therefore not subject to CEQA.
2. Authorize
the Director, Department of Environmental Health, as agent of the County,
to conduct all negotiations and submit all documents including, but
not limited to, applications, contract agreements, amendments and payment
requests which may be necessary to secure Environmental Education grant
funds for FY 01-02; and to execute a grant agreement upon award of grant
funds, including any extensions or amendments thereof, that do not materially
impact or alter either the grant program or funding level.
3. Waive Board Policy
B-29: Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for
Cost Recovery, with respect to full cost recovery for the implementation
of this grant.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
6. SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ON-SITE AIRPORT
Management SERVICES FOR Borrego Valley Airport
(Supv. Dist: 5)
OVERVIEW:
Borrego
Valley Airport is east of Borrego Springs within Anza Borrego Desert
State Park. Airport facilities include a 5,000-foot lighted runway and
taxiway, restaurant and bar, terminal building, aircraft ramp and hangars.
The airport handles approximately 12,000 operations per year. County
Airports is responsible for providing personnel to operate the airport
safely and efficiently.
Since
1997, County Airports has employed an on-site contractor to function
as airport manager at Borrego Valley Airport. This contract will expire
December 31, 2000.
This
is a request to authorize issuance of a Request for Proposals for continuation
of on-site airport management services. The contract will be awarded
for a period of one year, with four one-year options. Estimated annual
cost is up to $70,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for this request
are budgeted. Funding source is Airport Enterprise Fund. If approved,
this request will result in a current FY cost of $35,000 and $70,000
per year thereafter for the duration of the contract, if extended.
Contract term is one year with four-one year options. There will be
no impact to the General Fund.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1.
Find that the following action is not subject to California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(1) of CEQA Guidelines, because
it is not a project as defined in Section 15378.
2. Authorize the Deputy
Director, Purchasing and Contracting Division of General Services, in
accordance with Section 398.17.1(a) of County Administrative Code, to
issue a Request for Proposals and negotiate and award a contract to
acquire on-site airport management services for Borrego Valley Airport,
subject to approval of the Director of Public Works, and subject to
compliance with Board Policy A-96, Sequence for Obtaining a Chief Administrative
Officer Determination Regarding Economy and Efficiency of Independent
Contractors Pursuant to Charter Section 703.10.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
7. SUBJECT:
SUNSET REVIEW OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICIES, COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY
ORDINANCES, AND ADMINISTRATIVE CODES ASSIGNED TO DEPARTMENTS WITHIN
THE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP, AND ANIMAL CONTROL
(Supv.
Dist: All)
OVERVIEW:
On December 8, 1998 (53),
the Board of Supervisors approved the current Sunset Review Process,
which is based on a seven year review cycle of the Administrative Code,
Board of Supervisors Policies and the San Diego County Code of Regulatory
Ordinances. Department heads are responsible for ensuring ordinances,
policies and resolutions relevant to their respective department are
kept current. Sunset Review items are presented to the Board in increments
for approval as they reach sunset dates.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The requested action will
have no current year or annual cost, and will not require any additional
staff years.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
Amendments
to Division 1 of Title 6 will have a positive impact on the business
community. Food retailers are subject to the California Uniform Food
Facilities law. Amendments will repeal County Code sections no longer
required or necessary, allowing for simplification of compliance for
these businesses without compromising public health.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1. Find
in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the State California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines that it can be seen with certainty there
is no possibility the following actions may have a significant effect
on the environment.
2. Read
the title and waive further reading of the following Ordinances, and
introduce for further consideration and adoption on November 15, 2000:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XXXI
OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 6, DIVISIONS
1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES
RELATING TO FOOD AND HOUSING, CROPS AND PLANTS, DISEASE CONTROL, SANITATION
REGULATIONS FOR BUSINESSES, WATER AND WATER SUPPLIES, AND SEWAGE AND
REFUSE DISPOSAL, AND INSANITARY PREMISES
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE EXISTING
AND ADOPTING A REVISED CHAPTER 6 OF DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 6 OF THE SAN
DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL
AN
ORDINANCE REPEALING AND READOPTING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY UNIFORM SEWER
ORDINANCE, PROVIDING FOR MANAGEMENT OF DEPENDENT SAN DIEGO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS AND ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS FOR USE OF SEWERAGE FACILITIES
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AND SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
AN
ORDINANCE OF THE EAST OTAY MESA SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PROVIDING
FOR ADOPTION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ORDINANCE ________ BY REFERENCE
AN
ORDINANCE OF THE WINTER GARDENS SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PROVIDING
FOR ADOPTION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ORDINANCE ________ BY REFERENCE
3. Determine
no change is necessary for Administrative Code Article XLI-A, County
of San Diego Industrial Development Authority.
4. Determine
no change is necessary for County Code of Regulatory Ordinances Title
4, Public Property.
5. Determine
no change is necessary to, and approve new sunset dates as indicated
below, for the following Board of Supervisors Policies:
I-51 Connection to District Interceptor Sewers (12-31-02)
I-53 Cost Responsibility for the Construction
of Flood Control and Drainage Facilities Within Road Rights-of-Way (12-31-02)
I-56 Staged Construction of Offsite Flood
Control and Drainage Facilities Provided in the
Development or Subdivision of Property by the Private Sector (12-31-02)
A-124 Economic
Incentives (12-31-04)
6. Approve
amendments and a new sunset date for the following Board of Supervisors
Policy:
J-21 “One-Foot Strip”
Acceptance – (Road Openings)
7. Delete the following
Board of Supervisors Policy:
I-110 Guidelines for Negotiating Public Benefit Agreement
(Relates to Sanitation District Agenda Item No.
1)
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, introducing Ordinances
for further Board consideration on November 15,2000.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
8. SUBJECT:
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: NEW
APPOINTMENTS TO THE COUNTY’S SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD AND SUNSET ADVISORY
BOARD
(Supv. Dist: All)
OVERVIEW:
On
April 14, 1992 (45), the Board of Supervisors established the Science
Advisory Board. The Science Advisory Board is authorized eleven members.
Currently there is one vacancy on the Science Advisory Board. This
action will result in the appointment of one new member.
On
September 15, 1997 (42), the Board of Supervisors established the Sunset
Advisory Board for San Diego County. The Sunset Advisory Board is authorized
seven members, one representative for each supervisorial district and
two representatives for the Chief Administrative Officer. Currently
there are three vacancies on the Sunset Advisory Board. This action
will result in the appointment of one new member representing the Chief
Administrative Officer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not
Applicable.
BUSINESS
IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not
Applicable.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1. Appoint Dr.
Kurt Benirscke to a three-year term on the Science Advisory Board, for
a term to expire November 3, 2003.
2. Appoint
Farrah Douglas to an unexpired term of Marilyn Creson on the Sunset
Advisory Board, for a term to expire May 31, 2001.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
9. SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO JOINT AGREEMENT
(SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES), AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE IMPROVEMENTS,
FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT NO. 4744-1, FINAL MAP 13602, LOCATED
IN HIDDEN MEADOWS SPONSOR GROUP AREA
(Supv. Dist: 5)
OVERVIEW:
County of San Diego Tract
4744-1, Final Map 13602 is in the Lawrence Welk Village area of Escondido
on the north and south sides of Welk View Drive, extending from Champagne
Boulevard on the west to Welk Highland Drive on the east (Thomas Guide,
page 1089, C-1, 2000 Edition). The tract is within the Hidden Meadows
Sponsor Group area.
This is a request to approve
an Amendment to Joint Agreement (Substitution of Parties) and to extend,
for a period of two years, the performance completion date for County
of San Diego Tract 4744-1, Final Map 13602.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The recommended action
will have no fiscal impact.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not
Applicable.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1. Approve
and authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute the Amendment
to Joint Agreement to Improve Major Subdivision (Substitution of Parties).
2. Extend
to July 15, 2002, the performance completion date for County of San
Diego Tract 4744-1, Final Map 13602.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
10. SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO JOINT AGREEMENT (SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES),
FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT NO. 4863-1, FINAL MAP 13774, LOCATED
IN VALLE DE ORO PLANNING AREA
(Supv. Dist: 2)
OVERVIEW:
County
of San Diego Tract 4863-1, Final Map 13774 is in the Valle de Oro area,
north of Hillsdale Road, 0.25 mile east of Jamacha Road (Thomas Guide,
Page 1272, B-2, 2000 Edition). On April 14, 1999 (13), the Board approved
a final map and a Joint Agreement to Improve Major Subdivision, secured
by surety bonds to guarantee the construction of public improvements
required as a condition of the tentative map. Shea Homes Limited Partnership
has purchased the property and wishes to assume responsibility for making
required improvements.
This
is a request to approve an Amendment to Joint Agreement (Substitution
of Parties) for County of San Diego Tract 4863-1, Final Map 13774 (Slate
Property).
FISCAL IMPACT:
The recommended action
will have no fiscal impact.
BUSINESS
IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not
Applicable.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
Approve
and authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute the Amendment
to Joint Agreement to Improve Major Subdivision (Substitution of Parties).
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
11. SUBJECT:
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: Approval of a Final Map and Secured Agreement
for Private Improvements for County of San Diego Tract NO. 5115-1, Located
in THE VALLE DE ORO COMMUNITY Planning Area
(Supv. Dist: 2)
OVERVIEW:
This
project is a subdivision consisting of 10 single-family residential
lots, and a total acreage of 24.70 acres. It is located in the Valle
De Oro area on Grace Lamay Terrace, 0.04 miles east of Vista Grande
Road. (Thomas Guide, Page 1272, D1, 2000 Edition)
The
project is being brought before the Board for approval of the final
map and the secured agreements for the private improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This request will have
no fiscal impact.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not
applicable.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1.
Approve this map.
2. Accept the grant of an easement
for open space over portions of lots 1 through 10, as granted on said
map.
3. Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors to execute the Joint Agreement to Improve Major Subdivision,
which includes the street improvements and drainage facilities, water
facilities, and setting of final monuments,
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
12. SUBJECT: AMENDMENT
TO CONSULTANT CONTRACT FOR GENERAL PLAN 2020 (CARRYOVER ITEM FROM 10/25/00,
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13)
(Supv. Dist: All)
OVERVIEW:
On
October 25, 2000 (13) your Board of Supervisors continued this item
to November 1, 2000, and directed the Department of Planning and Land
Use to immediately notify all property owners in order to conduct further
discussion on the maps and plans, and to come back with a time line
in regards to the process and what’s to be accomplished.
General
Plan 2020 project is the comprehensive update of the San Diego County
General Plan. The General Plan establishes the future growth and development
patterns for the unincorporated area of the County. The General Plan
update will accommodate population growth and plan for infrastructure
needs, development, and resource preservation in the unincorporated
area to the year 2020. Currently the Department of Planning and Land
Use has a contract with Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC, to provide
consulting services for General Plan 2020. The contract was approved
by the Board of Supervisors on August 12, 1998 (2) and obtained through
competitive procurement. This contract was amended on February 28,
2000, to proceed with one of the consultant’s original optional services
to assist in the creation of a biological species prediction model.
Since
that time, a number of changes to the General Plan 2020 project extent
and process have occurred such as the expanded public participation
process, development of a transportation model, expansion of scope of
work for preparation of the Environmental Impact Report and development
of a population constraints model. In response to the changes in the
General Plan 2020 project, staff and the consultant team have negotiated
changes to the original Scope of Work and the Consultant Contract.
This is a request to authorize a second amendment
to the consultant contract. The additional project cost is $861,350,
which includes $721,350 for the added consultant tasks for a total contract
cost of $3,314,308 and $140,000 for optional tasks. In addition, the
contract amendment is needed to address additional tasks referred to
General Plan 2020 by the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission
and to expand the timeline for the project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If approved, this will result in $861,350 in the
current fiscal year for the contract amendment, and no annual costs
and will require the addition of no staff years. Of the $861,350 current
year cost, $800,000 is budgeted in the Department of Planning and Land
Use, the remaining $61,350 is available from the Land Use and Environmental
Group Management Reserves.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1. Approve and authorize execution
by the Clerk of the Board, the amended agreement with Wallace Roberts
& Todd, LLC, in the amount of $861,350, which includes an additional
$140,000 for optional tasks, and extending the contract to February 28,
2003, to provide planning, environmental, and mapping services. (4
VOTES)
2. Find that the
Board of Supervisors has determined that the proposed services can be
provided more economically and efficiently by the proposed independent
contractor than by persons in the Classified Service.
3. Transfer appropriations
in the amount of $61,350 from the Land Use Environmental Group Management
Reserves to the Department of Planning and Land Use for General Plan
2020 consultant costs. (4 VOTES)
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of
Supervisors took action as recommended adding the following: 1) Written
copies of both committees’ (Steering Committee and Interest Group Committee)
minutes should be distributed to the Board of Supervisors, between both
committees and should be made available on the County’s website; 2)
Both groups’ meeting schedules should be publicly noticed and placed
on the website; 3) County staff should provide background information
in advance to both groups to enable them to examine and compare current
General Plan standards with proposed new standards; and 4) Property
owners are not fully aware of the activities of both groups. Therefore,
community newspapers should be contacted to publish an overview of the
proposed changes (in each community) outlining potential land use impacts.
Further directed that discussion of guiding principles/goals and policies
scheduled for November 15, 2000 be rescheduled to January, 2001, following
noticing of the public.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
13. SUBJECT: FUNDING
FOR ACQUISITION OF RAMONA GRASSLAND
(Supv. Dist: 2)
OVERVIEW:
The recommended action will direct the Deputy Chief
Administrative Officer to work with the Grassland Preservation Project
to seek potential sources of funding for the acquisition of grasslands
in Ramona, within the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) North
County planning area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact related to this proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1.
Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to work
with the citizens' group, Grassland Preservation Project, to identify
potential sources of funding and willing sellers of land for the acquisition
of grasslands in Ramona, within the MSCP North County planning area.
2.
Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer and
County's Washington, D.C. and Sacramento representatives to work with
the County's delegation and other interested parties to secure funding
for acquisition of grasslands in Ramona.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board
of Supervisors took action as recommended.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
14. SUBJECT: SUPPORTING
FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE ELECTRICITY RATE
RELIEF (CARRYOVER ITEM FROM 10/31/2000,
AGENDA NO. 25)
(Supv. Dist: All)
OVERVIEW:
Approval of this item would express the Board's
support for several federal bills which have recently been introduced
to provide relief for San Diego electricity consumers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This action will result in no cost to the County
RECOMMENDATION:
CHAIRWOMAN JACOB AND SUPERVISOR COX:
1.
Support H.R. 5457 (Bilbray), H.R. 5458 (Bilbray),
H. Con. Res. 429 (Bilbray), H. Con. Res. 629 (Bilbray), and H. Con.
Res. 417 (Hunter).
2.
Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to add
these bills to the County's Legislative Program and direct the County's
federal legislative representative to set these issues as their highest
priority.
ACTION:
ON
MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of
Supervisors took action as recommended.
AYES:
Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn
15. SUBJECT: CLOSED SESSION
(CARRYOVER
ITEM FROM 10/31/2000, AGENDA NO. 20)
(Supv. Dist: All)
A.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Calvin
J. Belcher v. County of San Diego, et al.; San Diego Superior Court
No. GIC 741611
B.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
County
of San Diego v. Starwood Santa Fe Valley Partners; San Diego Superior
Court Case No. GIC 753429
C.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – THREATENED LITIGATION
Anticipated litigation
pursuant to section (b) of Government Code section 54956.9
No. of Potential Cases:
1
D.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Anticipated litigation
pursuant to section (c) of Government Code section 54956.9
No. of Potential Cases:
1
E.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Anticipated
litigation pursuant to section (c) of Government Code section 54956.9
No. of Potential Cases:
1
F.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Designated Representative:
Carlos Arauz, Madge Blakey and Mike Kolb
Employee
Organizations: Deputy Sheriffs Association
ACTION:
County
Counsel reported the following on Item E: The Board of Supervisors
authorized County Counsel to commence an action, the specifics of which
are not identified at this time. The defendants and other
particulars of the action may be disclosed, upon inquiry, after the
action is formally commenced.
16.
SUBJECT:
PRESENTATION/PROCLAMATIONS
Supervisor
Cox presented a Proclamation honoring World Town Planning DayAccepting
the Proclamation: Gary Pryor, Director of the Department of Planning
and Land Use; and Tony Lettieri, President of the California Chapter
of the American Planning Association.
Supervisor
Cox and Supervisor Roberts presented a Proclamation honoring the Workforce
Development Professional of the Year. Accepting the Proclamation:
Lawrence Fitch.
Supervisor Slater presented
a Proclamation honoring National French Week. Accepting the Proclamation:
Roberta Greene, French Educator, and her students.
Supervisor Horn presented
a Proclamation honoring Outstanding Customer and Community Service.
Accepting the Proclamation: Rick Windbigler from Fallbrook Equipment
Rental.
17. SUBJECT:
Public Communication
Ruth Harber addressed the
Board regarding unanswered record request relating Security Instrument
of the Revenue Agreement between the County and the Gregory Canyon.
She also addressed the Board regarding Sacramento representative lobbying
against Assembly Bill 2752 and why the Department of Environmental Health
will not honor the request from the public to receive a copy of their
responses to the three Environmental Impact Reports that were published
on Gregory Canyon.
Joyce Ward addressed the
Board requesting copies of all statements of County Counsel’s billings
to Palomar Aggregates and also written response from the County why
the Board’s lobbyist in Sacramento lobbied in opposition to AB2752.
ACTION:
Heard; referred to the Chief Administrative
Officer.
There being no further business, the Board adjourned
at 12:12 p.m., in memory of Dr. Robert Cloyes, Tom Moore, Ramona E.
Burk, Lauran G. Clapp, Dr. Raymond K. Locke, and Sean Nava
THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA
Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
County of San Diego, State of California
Notes by: Andoh
- - -
NOTE: This Statement
of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the Board of Supervisors
on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence
in which the matters were taken up
|