|
STATEMENT OF
PROCEEDINGS
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING
AND LAND USE MATTERS
WEDNESDAY, JULY 11,
2001, 9:00 AM
Board of Supervisors
North Chamber
1600 Pacific Highway,
Room 310, San Diego, California
MORNING SESSION: - Meeting
was called to order at 9:05 a.m.
Present: Supervisors Bill
Horn, Chairman; Ron Roberts, Vice Chairman; Greg Cox; Dianne Jacob and
Pam Slater; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.
Approval of Board of Supervisors
Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for meetings of
June 13, 2001 and June 20,
2001
ACTION:
Adding the following language
to clarify Minute Order No. 2 from the Board meeting of June 13, 2001”
and directed that the resolution be amended to add the clause “or will
withdraw such a protest which has previously been lodged by the County
of San Diego’ to the first paragraph of resolution”; ON MOTION of Supervisor
Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors approved
the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of June 13, 2001
and June 20, 2001
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Horn
ABSENT: Roberts
Board of Supervisors' Agenda
Items
|
1.
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
REORGANIZATION HEARING
TO DETACH FROM THE LOWER SWEETWATER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT THE
TERRITORY CONTAINED IN THE 31ST STREET ISLAND, DISSOLVE LOWER SWEETWATER
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND FORM COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 137 –
LINCOLN ACRES
|
|
2.
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
HEARING TO VACATE A
PORTION OF OLD HIGHWAY 395 (VAC 00-013), VALLEY CENTER COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREA
|
|
3.
|
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE PAUMA/YUIMA BAND OF MISSION
INDIANS FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH CASINO DEVELOPMENT
|
|
4.
|
AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING
TESTING FOR METHANE GAS ON ALL PROJECTS WITH MASS GRADING
|
|
5.
|
SET HEARING FOR 08/01/2001
SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT
SYSTEM FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIMS,
RURAL BUS SERVICE CONTRACT AND FEE ADJUSTMENT, AWARD OF CONTRACT
WITH LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC., FOR SUBURBAN TRANSIT SERVICES, AND BUS
PURCHASE
|
|
6.
|
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
WITH RAMONA MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR RESURFACING A PORTION
OF SAN VICENTE ROAD IN RAMONA
|
|
7.
|
STREET LIGHT PETITIONS
IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE AREAS OF CASA DE ORO, LAKESIDE, AND
RAINBOW
|
|
8.
|
SET HEARING FOR 08/01/2001
CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001-02
|
|
9.
|
ADVERTISE AND AWARD
CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
|
|
10.
|
CHIP SEALING OVER FABRIC
ON VARIOUS COUNTY ROADS IN BORREGO SPRINGS, ROAD MAINTENANCE DIVISION
2
|
|
11.
|
ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
PREVIOUSLY REJECTED OFFER TO DEDICATE SUBDIVISION STREET FOR COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO TRACT NO. 4763-1 (MAP 13491), LOCATED IN FALLBROOK
PLANNING GROUP AREA
|
|
12.
|
ASSUME AGREEMENT TO
IMPROVE MAJOR SUBDIVISION, LIEN CONTRACT AND HOLDING AGREEMENT
FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT NO. 4554-1 (FINAL MAP 13315), LOCATED
IN LAKE MORENA/CAMPO SPONSOR GROUP AREA
|
|
13.
|
APPROVAL OF A SECURED
AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 20331, LOCATED IN FALLBROOK COMMUNITY PLANNING AREA
|
|
14.
|
EXTENSION OF PERFORMANCE
COMPLETION DATES ON VARIOUS BONDED AGREEMENTS TO COMPLETE SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENTS
|
|
15.
|
CONTINUED NOTICED PUBLIC
HEARING:
CONSIDER RESPONSES TO
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO DEVELOP COUNTY PROPERTY IN SANTEE AND APPROVE
RECOMMENDATION OF SOURCE SELECTION COMMITTEE
(CARRYOVER ITEM FROM
7/10/2001, AGENDA NO. 8)
|
|
16.
|
CLOSED SESSION
(CARRYOVER ITEM FROM
7/10/2001, AGENDA NO. 22)
|
|
17.
|
OFF DOCKET ITEM:
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION
ORDINANCE RELATING TO TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR
ELEVEN EMPLOYEE BARGAINING UNITS REPRESENTED BY SERVICE EMPLOYEES
INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC
|
|
18.
|
OFF DOCKET ITEM:
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION
ORDINANCE RELATING TO TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR
THE PROBATION OFFICERS’ BARGAINING UNIT REPRESENTED BY SERVICE
EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC
|
|
19.
|
OFF DOCKET ITEM:
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION
ORDINANCE RELATING TO A RATIFIED AGREEMENT FOR THE DEPUTY COUNTY
COUNSELS UNITS (CC, CS) REPRESENTED BY THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPUTY
COUNTY COUNSELS’ ASSOCIATION
|
|
20.
|
OFF DOCKET ITEM:
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION
ORDINANCE RELATING TO TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR
THE SOCIAL WELFARE BARGAINING UNIT REPRESENTED BY SOCIAL SERVICES
UNION, LOCAL 535, SEIU, AFL-CIO
|
|
21.
|
PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS
|
|
22.
|
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
1.
|
SUBJECT:
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
REORGANIZATION HEARING
TO DETACH FROM THE LOWER SWEETWATER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT THE
TERRITORY CONTAINED IN THE 31ST STREET ISLAND, DISSOLVE LOWER SWEETWATER
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND FORM COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 137 –
LINCOLN ACRES (DISTRICT: 1)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
On July 20, 1999 (9)
the Board adopted and approved submittal of a Resolution of Application
to the Local Agency Formation Commission requesting initiation of
proceedings for reorganization in order to detach, from the Lower
Sweetwater Fire Protection District, the territory contained in
the “31st Street Island Annexation to the City of National
City” (31st Street Island), dissolve the Lower Sweetwater
Fire Protection District, and form County Service Area No. 137 –
Lincoln Acres.
On May 7, 2001 (9b),
the Local Agency Formation Commission approved proposed detachment
of the territory contained in the 31st Street Island
from the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District, and dissolution
of Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District to be Reorganized as
County Service Area No. 137 – Lincoln Acres. The Board of Supervisors,
as conducting authority, is the legislative body authorized to conduct
proceedings for a change of organization or reorganization.
Today's hearing provides
citizens in the affected area a chance to file protests. At close
of today's hearing, if no majority protest exists, the Board is
requested to adopt a resolution to complete the reorganization process,
under the condition that protests filed and not withdrawn within
the next 30 days represent less than 50% of the registered voters
or landowners in the affected territory. If protests fall between
25 and 50 percent, this proposal would go to an election.
County Service Area
No. 137 – Lincoln Acres, if formed, will assume administration of
the former district services and continue provision of fire protection
and emergency medical services through contract with National City.
County staff experienced in administration of special districts
will provide contract administration at substantial savings to area
residents.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Funds for this request
are budgeted. The funding source is DPW General Fund reserves. If
approved, this request will result in a cumulative current year
and subsequent year formation cost of approximately $7,000 and will
require the addition of no staff years. Annual administrative costs
for the new district are expected to be approximately $2,000 and
will be funded by the district’s share of the 1% ad valorem property
tax which funds all district activities.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
Find, in accordance
with Section 15320 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, that it can be seen with certainty this reorganization
is not subject to the environmental impact evaluation process because
the proposal consists of a change in organization of governmental
agencies, which does not change the area in which previously existing
powers are exercised.
Adopt the Resolution
Entitled Resolution Detaching from The Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection
District the Territory Contained in the “31st Street
Island Annexation to the City of National City” and Establishing
County Service Area No. 137 – Lincoln Acres as Successor Agency
for Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors closed
the hearing and took action as recommended, adopting Resolution
No. 01-182, entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ADOPTING A ZERO SPHERE OF INFLUENCE FOR
THE LINCOLN ACRES COUNTY SERVICE AREA; AND MAKING DETERMINATIONS
AND APPROVING THE "LINCOLN ACRES COUNTY SERVICE AREA REORGANIZATION"
AND THE "DISSOLUTION OF THE LOWER SWEETWATER FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Robert, Horn
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2.
|
SUBJECT:
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
HEARING TO VACATE
A PORTION OF OLD HIGHWAY 395 (VAC 00-013), VALLEY CENTER COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREA (DISTRICT: 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This is a request to
adopt a Resolution of Vacation to vacate a portion of Old Highway
395 (Record of Survey 15156) in the community of Valley Center.
The portion of right-of-way to be vacated is the easterly 53 feet
of Old Highway 395 from Nelson Way to 1328 feet north (Thomas Guide
page 1068, J-3). The County of San Diego currently has a 200-foot
wide right-of-way on this portion of Old Highway 395, which is classified
as a Rural Collector with Bike Lanes on the County’s Circulation
Element. Required right-of-way width for Old Highway 395 is 94
feet. Based on its current classification, the road has an excess
106 feet of right-of-way not needed for public use.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1.
Find the project as proposed is categorically exempt from provisions
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA
Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). Proposed
project is a road vacation, in an area with an average slope less
than 20%, which does not result in any changes in land use or density.
2.
Adopt a Resolution entitled Resolution Vacating A Portion of Old
Highway 395. (Attachment A)
3.
Direct the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to record this Resolution
pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8325.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors closed
the hearing and took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting
Resolution No. 01-183, entitled: RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION
OF OLD HIGHWAY 395.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
3.
|
SUBJECT:
|
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE PAUMA/YUIMA BAND OF MISSION
INDIANS FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH CASINO DEVELOPMENT
(DISTRICT: 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
Several San Diego County
Indian Bands have signed Tribal State Gaming Compacts with Governor
Gray Davis, which allow them to build up to two Class III casinos
on their reservations. The casinos will have significant impacts
on County roads; therefore the County intends to work with each
of the Gaming Tribes to develop agreements to ensure that impacts
are adequately mitigated. The Agreement before the Board today
is the third of what staff hopes will be negotiated with each of
the Gaming Tribes whose projects impact County resources and infrastructure.
Rincon Band agreement was approved March 20, 2001 (12), and San
Pasqual Band agreement was approved June 19, 2001 (1).
The Pauma/Yuima Band
(Pauma Band) of Mission Indians is one of the 12 Bands in the county
that have signed a Tribal State Gaming Compact. The Pauma and Yuima
Reservation is in the northwestern area of unincorporated San Diego
County, against the foothills of Mount Palomar. Pauma Band has developed
a temporary Class III casino, and plans to construct a permanent
casino. Access to Pauma Band’s gaming projects is via State Route
76 and Pauma Reservation Road, which is within the County maintained
system. Further east, State Route 76 connects to Valley Center Road,
which will be improved as part of the County's Capital Improvement
Program.
This is a request to
approve a Cooperative Agreement (Agreement) with Pauma Band, where
Pauma Band will provide necessary improvements to Pauma Reservation
Road and its intersection with State Route 76 (Pala Road), and contribute
toward the Valley Center Road project. The Agreement will result
in road improvements totaling approximately $1.45 million. This
is the third such agreement entered into with a tribal band of Indians.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Pauma Band will construct
improvements in compliance with County standards at no cost to the
County, and will compensate the County for costs associated with
plan review, inspection and permit processing. A contribution of
$129,000 will be provided by Pauma Band during FY 2001-02 for planned
improvements to Valley Center Road. No subsequent costs or revenues
or additional staff years will be required.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find the following
action is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
review because it is not a project as defined in Section 15378.
2. Approve
and authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute two
copies of a Cooperative Agreement between the County of San Diego
and Pauma/Yuima Band of Mission Indians for Road Improvements Associated
with Casino Development.
3. Authorize
the Director, Department of Public Works, to receive, file and execute
any documents necessary to administer this Agreement.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Horn, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
4.
|
SUBJECT:
|
AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING
TESTING FOR METHANE GAS ON ALL PROJECTS WITH MASS GRADING (DISTRICTS:
ALL)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
Supervisor Slater Board
letter adopted October 25, 2000 (3).
On October 25, 2000
(3) the Board directed staff to develop an ordinance requiring methane
gas testing on properties in the Santa Fe Valley area. Development
of the ordinance was delayed from the anticipated completion date
of January 2001, to allow for the ongoing inclusion of new methane
gas data from development projects both inside and outside the Santa
Fe Valley area and to meet with building industry representatives.
Subsequent to the Board
direction, methane gas has been found in other developments outside
of the Santa Fe Valley. Based on these new occurrences, methane
gas may also be present in additional areas of the County. This
letter proposes to establish an ordinance that will be reviewed
by the Board of Supervisors within six months, requiring methane
gas testing countywide on projects with mass grading. Methane gas
testing is necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
There is no fiscal impact
associated with these recommendations.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find that the
proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) as specified under section 15308 of the State CEQA Guidelines
for the reasons detailed in the Notice of Exemption Form dated July
11, 2001 and explained in the environmental statement set forth
below. (Attachment A)
2. Approve the introduction
of the Ordinance, (first reading), and read title and waive further
reading of the Ordinance.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING
CHAPTER 3 TO DIVISION 6 OF TITLE 8 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE
RELATED TO TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR METHANE GAS ON ALL PROJECTS
WITH MASS GRADING. (Attachment B)
Submit the Ordinance
for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on
July 18, 2001.
3. Direct the Chief
Administrative Officer to report back to the Board within six months
of the effective date of the ordinance with a recommendation, based
on test results, to modify, repeal or continue the ordinance in
effect.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob , the Board of Supervisors
took action as recommended, on Consent, introducing Ordinance for
further Board consideration and adoption on July 18, 2001.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
5.
|
SUBJECT:
|
SET HEARING FOR 08/01/2001
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
TRANSIT SYSTEM FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
CLAIMS, RURAL BUS SERVICE CONTRACT AND FEE ADJUSTMENT, AWARD OF
CONTRACT WITH LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC., FOR SUBURBAN TRANSIT SERVICES,
AND BUS PURCHASE (DISTRICT: ALL)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
On April 4, 2001 (8),
the County Board of Supervisors directed the Chief Administrative
Officer to explore the possibility of divestiture of County Transit
System (CTS) to Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB). Analysis
of possible divestiture and its implementation are in progress.
While analysis proceeds, CTS must ensure transit funding, contracts
and services to the public are continued.
Recommended actions
described in this letter authorize: a) submittal of Transportation
Development Act claims to fund services, facilities and equipment;
b) execution of transit contracts and actions necessary to continue
transit services; c) adjustments to rural bus fares for simplification
and to ensure state-required passenger fare ratio is met; d) award
of a five-year East County Suburban fixed-route contract to Laidlaw
Transit Inc.; and e) approval to negotiate for sole source purchase
of new transit coach to replace three older buses lost to fire.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Recommendation 1
Funds for this request
are included in the FY 2001-02 Transit Enterprise Fund Operational
Plan. Funding sources for the claim and contract actions are FY
2001-02 Transit Development Act monies of $1,731,657 and passenger
revenues of $147,860 available to the County. If approved, this
request will result in FY 2001-02 revenue and cost of $1,879,517.
Recommendation 2
Funds for annual sole
source agreements with Northeast Rural Bus System, Inc. ($114,094),
and Southeast San Diego Senior Citizen's Program Board ($149,413),
for bus service in rural San Diego County are available from Transportation
Development Fund Claims recommended for approval in Recommendation
1.
Recommendations 3
and 4
If approved, the Rural
Bus fare adjustment is expected to result in an estimated increase
in rural passenger fare revenues of $21,753 during Fiscal Year 2001-02.
Note that total Rural Bus costs include buses, facilities and service
contracts.
Recommendation 5
Approval of a contract
for Suburban Route services is budgeted in the FY 2001-02 Transit
Enterprise Fund Operational Plan. Funding source for the Suburban
Route service contract with Laidlaw Transit Services Inc. is passenger
revenues and Transportation Development Act Funds. The average ratio
of fare revenue to TDA funds countywide is approximately 32%. If
approved, this contract will result in an estimated current year
cost of $9,581,612 and subsequent year cost of $9,581,612. Total
estimated contract cost is $52,662,444 over the five-year term,
including fuel, performance bonuses and other pass-through costs.
Recommendations 6
and 7
Approval of mid-year
claim and amendment to FY 2001-02 spending plan to procure a transit
bus, in a maximum amount of $136,000 (actual amount to be negotiated).
Funding sources are passenger fare revenues and TDA funds.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Approve
FY 2001-02 San Diego County Transit System, Transportation Development
Act claims in the amount of $1,731,657 for submittal to SANDAG.
2. Approve
and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, amendments
to sole source agreements with Northeast Rural Bus System, Inc.
($114,094), and Southeast San Diego Senior Citizen's Program Board
($149,413), for FY 2000-01 bus service in rural San Diego County.
3. Direct
the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to set a public hearing for
August 1, 2001, at 9:00 A.M. to consider adjusting Rural Bus fares,
and to provide notice required by law.
4. At
close of August 1, 2001, hearing, adopt a Resolution entitled Resolution
Authorizing a Passenger Fare Adjustment for San Diego County Transit
System Rural Bus Service, effective August 13, 2001.
5. Find
Metropolitan Transit Development Board’s procurement of contractor
for East County Suburban fixed route service to be in compliance
with County procurement requirements, and direct the Director, Department
of Purchasing and Contracting, in accordance with Administrative
Code Section 401, to certify the process and award a contract to
Laidlaw Transit Inc. at a total estimated cost of $52,662,444 for
a five-year contract term.
6. Approve
a mid-year Transportation Development Act claim and County Transit
System spending plan amendment in an amount of up to $136,000 for
procurement of one 2001 National El Dorado RE transit coach currently
owned by First Transit.
7. Approve
and authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting,
to negotiate with First Transit Inc., on loss settlement for exchange
of three burned out buses for one 2001 National El Dorado RE transit
coach currently owned by First Transit.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent, setting this matter for hearing
on August 1, 2001, 9:00 a.m.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
6.
|
SUBJECT:
|
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
WITH RAMONA MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR RESURFACING A PORTION
OF SAN VICENTE ROAD IN RAMONA (DISTRICT: 2)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
The Ramona Municipal
Water District has installed a water force main on San Vicente Road
in the vicinity of San Diego Country Estates. As a condition of
the Excavation Permit issued by the County, the District is required
to resurface San Vicente Road upon completion of construction. In
lieu of performing the resurfacing work, the District has requested
the County to do this work at the sole expense of Ramona Municipal
Water District. The County Department of Public Works routinely
manages resurfacing work on County roads. By administering this
project the County will be better able to assure quality of work
and coordinate the project to minimize disruption and inconvenience
to local motorists.
This is a request to
approve and authorize execution of an Agreement with the Ramona
Municipal Water District for resurfacing a portion of San Vicente
Road. The Agreement delineates financing and reimbursing arrangements.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
If approved this request
will result in current year cost and revenue of $90,000, no subsequent
year costs, and no additional staff years. There will be no fiscal
impact to the County General Fund.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find
in accordance with Section 15301 of California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines that this project is categorically exempt
from provisions of the CEQA since it consists of maintenance and
repair of existing facilities with no increase in capacity.
2. Approve
and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute three originals,
upon receipt, of the Agreement Between the County of San Diego and
the Ramona Municipal Water District for the Resurfacing of San Vicente
Road in the Vicinity of Ramona.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
7.
|
SUBJECT:
|
STREET LIGHT PETITIONS
IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE AREAS OF CASA DE ORO, LAKESIDE, AND
RAINBOW (DISTRICT: 2 AND 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
There are areas of the
County that developed before street lights were required and where
lights are now desirable. Property owners may rectify this situation
by forming or annexing to a zone within the San Diego County Street
Lighting District. The Lighting District includes the entire unincorporated
area, and is currently composed of two zones. Zone A provides street
lighting and charges benefiting properties an annual assessment
for operation and maintenance of the lights. Properties in Zone
B receive no lighting services but are not charged.
This item involves approval
of petitions from property owners to annex to Zone A for provision
of street lights in their areas. In Board Policy J-20, Lighting
District Zone Formation and Annexations, such petitions will be
approved unless the weighted value of petition responses opposing
the proposal exceeds those approving it. Property owners in the
communities of Casa de Oro, Lakeside and Rainbow have submitted
five street light petitions, presented here for Board approval.
The petition for Explorer
Place/Sunray Place/Mars Way was previously presented to the Board
on December 6, 2000 (2a) and continued to allow the Valle de Oro
Planning Group to give input. The Planning Group opposes four of
the seven proposed lights. However, the petition is supported by
55.0 percent of the responses, and many petitioners have called
staff with favorable comments regarding the lights. In conformance
with J-20, the recommended action is approval of Explorer Place/Sunray
Place/Mars Way petition as well as the other four petitions.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Costs to process petitions
are an expense to benefiting property owners. Costs to operate
and maintain street lights are a regularly budgeted expense of the
San Diego County Street Lighting District. If approved, this request
will result in no annual cost and will require no additional staff
years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find,
in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, it can be seen with certainty there
is no possibility the following actions may have a significant effect
on the environment and are therefore not subject to CEQA.
2. Approve
the following Petitions:
a)
Lomo del Sur (Casa de Oro) for ten lights
b)
Lemon Crest Drive (Lakeside) for four lights.
c)
Olde Highway 80 East (Lakeside) for seven lights.
d)
Huffstatler Street (Rainbow) for three lights.
e)
Explorer Place/Sunray Place/Mars Way (Casa de Oro) for seven lights.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors
directed the Chief Administrative Officer to conduct a re-vote based
on the new boundaries.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
8.
|
SUBJECT:
|
SET HEARING FOR 08/01/2001
CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001-02 (DISTRICT: ALL)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
The San Diego County
Street Lighting District operates and maintains 8,500 public street
lights throughout the unincorporated area of the County. The District
is funded through a portion of the one-percent property tax and
assessments charged to properties that benefit from the lights.
The proposed rate of $2.50 per benefit unit is unchanged since 1990.
The assessments are
confirmed by the Board of Supervisors at an annual public hearing.
The procedure involves approving the Engineer’s Report for the District,
adopting a resolution of intention that sets a date for the public
hearing, and adopting a resolution confirming the assessments at
the close of the hearing.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Funds for this proposal
are budgeted in the San Diego County Street Lighting District.
If approved, this request will result in no additional current year
cost, no annual cost, and require no additional staff years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find
that the proposed activity is exempt from California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) as specified under the CEQA Guidelines Section
15061(b)(1) because the activity in question is the annual adoption
of resolutions to confirm assessments after a public hearing.
2. Accept
and approve the Engineer’s Report for the San Diego County Street
Lighting District.
3. Adopt
a Resolution entitled Resolution of Intention to Order Improvements
for the San Diego County Street Lighting District, setting August
1, 2001, for the public hearing.
4. At
close of the public hearing, adopt a Resolution entitled Resolution
Confirming Diagram and Assessments in the San Diego County Street
Lighting District.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution No. 01-184,
entitled: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE
SAN DIEGO COUNTY STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT; setting this matter for
hearing on August 1, 2001, 9:00 a.m.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
9.
|
SUBJECT:
|
ADVERTISE AND AWARD
CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (DISTRICT: 2)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
In May 2000, a 600-foot
portion of Engineers Road in the Lake Cuyamaca area was damaged
by water after an abandoned water pipe was mistakenly opened by
earthmoving employees working on private property. The water eroded
the roadbed under Engineers Road and has caused cracking and subsidence
of the asphalt surface. Repairs are needed before the damage worsens.
County Counsel is in the process of securing reimbursement from
the involved private parties for reimbursement to the County for
repair costs.
This is a request for
approval to advertise and subsequently award a contract to the lowest
responsible bidder to reconstruct the structural section of the
damaged portion of Engineers Road in the vicinity of the Cuyamaca
Mountains. Additionally, transfer of appropriations is requested
from the Department of Public Works Road Fund general Road Maintenance
activity into Engineers Road to cover costs, with the intention
to obtain reimbursement from responsible parties.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Because repair to Engineers
Road is being contracted to an outside vendor, transfer of appropriations
(within the Road Fund, from Road Maintenance to Engineers Road)
is necessary to provide payment. Future reimbursement to the Road
Fund from responsible private parties is anticipated. Funding source
for this project is Gas Tax. Requested actions will result in approximately
$100,000 current year cost, no subsequent cost, and will require
no additional staff years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find,
in accordance with Section 15301 of California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this project is categorically exempt from
provisions of CEQA since it consists of maintenance of existing
facilities with no increase in capacity.
2. Transfer
appropriations in the amount of $100,000 within the Department of
Public Works Org 5766, Account 2324, Task 324, from Activity 4C2000
(FY 2001-02 Road Maintenance) to Activity 1C2005 (Engineer’s Road).
(4 VOTES)
3. Authorize
the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to take
any action authorized by Section 403 of the Administrative Code
with respect to contracting for subject public works project.
4. Designate
the Director, Department of Public Works, as County Officer responsible
for administering the project.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
10.
|
SUBJECT:
|
CHIP SEALING OVER
FABRIC ON VARIOUS COUNTY ROADS IN BORREGO SPRINGS, ROAD MAINTENANCE
DIVISION 2 (DISTRICT: 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
The County maintains
approximately 1,900 miles of roads in unincorporated areas. The
Department of Public Works contracts chip sealing over fabric for
County roads in the desert community on an annual basis. Chip sealing
over fabric is a protective measure appropriate for roadways in
extreme weather conditions that have enough structural strength
to withstand the weight of traffic. This application protects roadways
from rain and heat, impedes deterioration, and costs much less than
asphalt overlays, which are needed when roads are badly deteriorated
and losing their structural strength. This project will maintain
the structural integrity of roadway sections and delay future road
repairs.
This is a request for
approval to advertise and subsequently award a contract, to the
lowest responsible bidder, to chip seal over fabric 27 road segments
totaling 13.72 miles of County maintained roads in the Borrego Springs
area.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Funds for this project
are budgeted in the Department of Public Works Road Fund. Funding
source is Gas Tax funds. This request will result in $1 million
current year cost, no annual cost and will require no additional
staff years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find,
in accordance with Section 15301 of California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines, that this project is categorically exempt
from provisions of the Guidelines since it consists of maintenance
of existing facilities with no increase in capacity.
2. Authorize
the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to take
any action authorized by Section 403 of the Administrative Code
with respect to contracting for subject public works project.
3. Designate
the Director, Department of Public Works, as County Officer responsible
for administering the contract.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
11.
|
SUBJECT:
|
ADOPT A RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING PREVIOUSLY REJECTED OFFER TO DEDICATE SUBDIVISION STREET
FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT NO. 4763-1 (MAP 13491) LOCATED IN
FALLBROOK PLANNING GROUP AREA (DISTRICT: 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This letter is regarding
a recorded subdivision consisting of 13 single-family residential
lots, and a total of 4.00 acres in the Fallbrook area, on the westerly
side of Morro Road at the intersection with La Rue Avenue (Thomas
Guide, Page 1027, G-3 , 2001 Edition). On January 28, 1998 (6),
the Board approved an Amendment to Agreement to Improve Subdivision,
released Lien Contract, terminated the Holding Agreement, and accepted
a Performance Bond and a Labor & Material Bond to secure improvements.
The project is being
brought before the Board for adoption of a resolution accepting
a previously rejected offer to dedicate La Rue Avenue.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Adopt
Resolution Accepting Previously Rejected Offer to Dedicate Subdivision
Street, accepting the previously rejected offer of dedication of
La Rue Avenue, Map No. 13491. (Attachment A)
2. Direct
the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to record the adopted Resolution
Accepting Previously Rejected Offer to Dedicate Subdivision Street
with the San Diego County Recorder.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob , the Board of Supervisors
took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution No.
01-185, entitled: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PREVIOUSLY REJECTED OFFER
TO DEDICATE SUBDIVISION STREET.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
12.
|
SUBJECT:
|
ASSUME AGREEMENT
TO IMPROVE MAJOR SUBDIVISION, LIEN CONTRACT AND HOLDING AGREEMENT
FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT NO. 4554-1 (FINAL MAP 13315), LOCATED
IN LAKE MORENA/CAMPO SPONSOR GROUP AREA (DISTRICT: 2)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
County of San Diego
Tract 4554-1, Final Map 13315 is located in the Campo area, on both
sides of Sheridan Road, 3,000 feet southerly of Highway 94 . (Thomas
Guide, Page 1318, B-6 , 2001 Edition)
The project is being
brought before the Board for approval of an Agreement to Assume
Agreement to Improve Major Subdivision, Lien Contract and Holding
Agreement No. 00-1252.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Approve and authorize
the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute the Agreement to
Assume Agreement to Improve Major Subdivision, Lien Contract and
Holding Agreement No. 00-1252 . (Attachment A)
2. Direct the Clerk
of the Board to record the signed agreement in coordination with
the escrow company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, immediately
following transfer of the property to the new owner.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
13.
|
SUBJECT:
|
APPROVAL OF A SECURED
AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 20331, LOCATED IN FALLBROOK COMMUNITY PLANNING AREA
(DISTRICT: 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This project is a minor
subdivision consisting of 4 single-family residential lots, and
a total of 0.94 acres. It is located in the Fallbrook area, on
the west side of Summit Avenue, 100’ south of the intersection of
Summit Avenue and Beech Street . (Thomas Guide, Page 1027, E-3
, 2001 Edition)
The project is being
brought before the Board for approval of the secured agreement for
public improvements.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Approve
and authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute the
Agreement to Improve Minor Subdivision, which includes street improvements,
sewer and water facilities. (Attachment A)
2. Approve
and authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute the
Improvement Security Agreement Cash Deposit. (Attachment B)
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
| |
|
|
14.
|
SUBJECT:
|
EXTENSION OF PERFORMANCE
COMPLETION DATES ON VARIOUS BONDED AGREEMENTS TO COMPLETE SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENTS (DISTRICT: 2, 3, 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW:
On July 6, 1976 (34)
the Board of Supervisors approved a process for extending the time
to complete improvements for major subdivisions. In this process,
the Department of Public Works reviews all existing subdivision
agreements every four months and recommends a time extension, when
determined appropriate, for agreements whose completion dates are
approaching. This process is more efficient than reviewing and preparing
Board letters for each subdivision agreement as it nears expiration.
This is a request to
extend the date subdivision improvements are required to be completed
by developers under existing bonded agreements. They are referenced
by their Tentative Map numbers for convenience, but all have Final
Maps previously approved by the Board
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Recommended action has
no fiscal impact.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
Extend to July 11, 2002,
the performance completion date in subdivision agreements for developments
referenced by Tentative Map numbers 4016-1, 4053-2, 4227-1, 4227-2,
4229-1, 4229-2, 4229-3, 4229-4, 4351-1, 4569-1, 4569-3, 4569-4,
4569-5, 4569-6, 4592-1, 4607-1, 4613-1, 4613-2, 4653-1, 4655-1,
4665-1, 4724-1, 4725-1, 4731-1, 4775-1, 4776-1, 4781-1, 4797-1,
4797-2, 4797-3, 4804-1, 4805-1, 4806-1, 4817-1, 4821-1, 4828-4,
4828-5, 4828-6, 4828-11, 4828-12, 4828-13, 4828-14, 4828-15, 4837-1,
4847-1, 4854-3, 4862-2, 4867-1, 4901-1, 4904-1, 4951-1, 5005-1,
5016-1, 5016-2, 5037-1, 5061-1, 5073-1, 5078-1, 5090-1, 5090-2,
5090-3, 5119-1 and 5123-1.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Slater, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
|
15. SUBJECT:
CONTINUED NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDER RESPONSES TO REQUEST
FOR PROPOSALS TO DEVELOP COUNTY PROPERTY IN SANTEE AND APPROVE RECOMMENDATION
OF SOURCE SELECTION COMMITTEE
(CARRYOVER ITEM FROM 7/10/2001,
AGENDA NO. 8)
(Supv. Dist: 2)
OVERVIEW:
On July 10, 2001 (8), your
Board continued this item to July 11, 2001.
The County owns 326 acres
of land within the City of Santee. The southern portion of this tract
includes land that is suitable for the development of a master planned
office park with facilities for high-tech and other related commercial
businesses. Today’s recommended actions will allow the County to move
forward in association with one qualified Master Developer to initiate
this long-envisioned development that will improve the job and overall
economic base of Santee and the East County.
Board of Supervisors actions,
December 12, 2000 (9), authorized the Director of General Services to
prepare and release a Request for Proposals (RFP) to master plan and develop
257 acres of County owned property in the City of Santee, reserving 61
acres for County use (see Attachment A). The RFP was preceded by a Request
for Qualifications that identified four development teams with the experience
and financial capability to complete a project on the County’s property,
based on a land use plan to be approved by the City of Santee. Three
developer proposals were received by the April 9, 2001 deadline, from
Lankford & Associate, Inc., Ryan Companies US, Inc., and San Diego
High Tech Visions.
A Source Selection Committee,
appointed by the Director of General Services, evaluated the developer
proposals. This committee included one representative of the County,
one representative of the City of Santee, and three independent business
professionals with expertise in urban planning, economic development,
and real estate finance. Gerald Trimble of the real estate and economic
development consulting firm of Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. served
as technical advisor to County staff and the committee.
After reviewing the developer
proposals, considering formal presentations from each developer and considering
responses to follow up questions posed by the committee, the Source Selection
Committee unanimously concluded that Ryan Companies US presented the best
proposal to develop the County’s property.
On June 27, 2001, the Santee
City Council met to consider the recommendation of the County’s Selection
Committee and passed a resolution confirming the committee’s recommendation
to select Ryan Companies US as the developer of the County’s property.
The Board of Supervisors set
July 10, 2001, as the time to consider recommendations of the Source Selection
Committee. The Board is requested to consider the three developer proposals
and the recommendation of the Source Selection Committee as confirmed
by the Santee City Council, and to select Ryan Companies US to master
plan and develop approximately 257 acres of County-owned land in the City
of Santee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The funds for this request
are partially budgeted. Appropriations in the amount of $50,000 are budgeted
in the Edgemoor Development Fund. Additional funds in the amount of $150,000
are being appropriated in this Board action. This request will result
in current year costs of $200,000 offset by developer contributions of
$150,000, no annual costs, and will require no additional staff years.
Subsequent years' revenue is uncertain at this time. The amount and timing
of the revenue will be dependent on the entitlement approval process and
the market response to the development. Following approval of the business
points (six to nine months), the developer will pay the County an additional
$250,000 for the right to control the property though the entitlement
period.
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
Ryan Companies US will open
an office in San Diego County for purposes of fulfilling its obligations
under contract with the County. Ryan Companies US estimates that it will
spend during the next 18 to 24 months, up to $1,400,000 locally to obtain
environmental clearance and entitlements required to develop the County’s
property. Assuming the developer is successful in obtaining entitlements,
Ryan Companies US estimates that the project will generate construction
activity in excess of $100 million and up to 5,800 permanent jobs over
a period of seven to ten years.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1.
Find that the Board has received and considered the responses to the Request
for Proposals to Develop Surplus County Property in Santee contained in
this staff report to the Board.
2.
Adopt the Source Selection Committee’s recommendation to select Ryan Companies
US as the Master Developer of the County’s surplus property in Santee.
3.
Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to execute an
Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Ryan Companies US, Inc. in
substantially the same form as attached hereto as Attachment B.
4.
Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, as the County's
Lease Administrator, to negotiate the business terms of a Development
Agreement (with option to purchase or lease) for the County’s Surplus
Property in Santee with Ryan Companies US.
5.
Direct the Director, Department of General Services to return to the Board
to Adopt an Ordinance to enter into a Development Agreement for the County’s
Surplus Property in Santee should negotiations with Ryan Companies US
result in a tentative agreement, or in the alternative, to report that
negotiations were unsuccessful and recommend that the Board authorize
negotiations with one or both of the other qualified developers.
6.
Amend the Edgemoor Development Fund Spending Plan to increase in the amount
of $150,000 in org 5481, account 2315, professional and specialized services
offset by revenue from the developer in account 9995. (4 VOTES)
7. Find, in accordance with
section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines,
that the preparation and acceptance of an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement
is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
because it can be seen with certainty that these actions will not have
an adverse effect on the environment.
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob,
seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as
recommended; directed the Chief Administrative Officer to establish a
criteria requiring improvements to the San Diego River through the City
of Santee to be consistent with the required standard established for
private landowners in the Lakeside area.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
16. SUBJECT:
CLOSED SESSION
(CARRYOVER ITEM FROM 7/10/2001,
AGENDA NO. 22)
(Supv. Dist: All )
OVERVIEW:
A. CONFERENCE WITH
LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Guadalupe Leon, et al. v.
County of San Diego, et al.; United States District Court No. 00-CV-1292
B. CONFERENCE WITH
LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
County of San Diego v. City
of San Marcos, et al.; Riverside County Superior Court No. 292531
C. CONFERENCE WITH
LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Darcie Rohman v. County of
San Diego, et al; San Diego Superior Court No. GIC 764898
D. CONFERENCE WITH
LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
A. David Stutz v. County of
San Diego, et al.; San Diego Superior Court Case No. GIC 766221
E. CONFERENCE WITH
LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Walter M. Shaw, et al. v.
Cal West Alpine Association, et al.; San Diego Superior Court No. GIC
747634
F. CONFERENCE WITH
LEGAL COUNSEL – THREATENED LITIGATION
Anticipated litigation pursuant
to section (b) of Government Code section 54956.9
No. of Potential Cases:
1
G. CONFERENCE WITH
LEGAL COUNSEL – THREATENED LITIGATION
Anticipated litigation pursuant
to section (b) of Government Code section 54956.9
No. of Potential Cases:
1
H. CONFERENCE WITH
LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Designated Representatives:
Carlos Arauz, Madge Blakey and Mike Kolb
Employee Organizations:
All
ACTION:
In compliance with Government
Section Code Section 51957.1, County Counsel reported the following
action: On Item E, by affirmative vote of all five members of the Board
of Supervisors, the County authorized County Counsel to enter into a settlement
agreement and mutual release with the cross complaint in that action.
17.
SUBJECT: OFF DOCKET ITEM:
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION
ORDINANCE RELATING TO TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR ELEVEN
EMPLOYEE BARGAINING UNITS REPRESENTED BY SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL
UNION, LOCAL 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC
(Supv. Dist: All )
OVERVIEW:
This action: 1) presents Compensation
Ordinance amendments for a first reading of negotiated provisions in four
Memoranda of Agreement between the County and the Service Employees International
Union, Local 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC currently undergoing the ratification
process; 2) adds equity adjustments for specific classes; and 3) adds
premiums and other benefits.
Tentative Agreement was reached
by County representatives with the Service Employees International Union,
Local 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC on July 3, 2001. The agreement is for a five-year
term.
The Tentative Agreement is
now undergoing the ratification process. On-site voting is under way
at County worksites and will continue until July 16, 2001. The Union
will inform the County of the results of the voting by noon on July 16.
The Memoranda of Agreement for all units that ratify will be presented
to your Board for consideration and approval on July 17, 2001.
The agreement includes, among
other wage and benefit improvements, major enhancements to employee retirement
benefits. The requirements of the 1937 Retirement Act makes the implementation
of retirement benefit improvements contingent upon the resolution of negotiations
with all employee unions in order to implement the improvements Countywide.
This could delay the date of implementation. However, if all contingencies
are met, the conversion of Tier II to Tier I will occur October 19, 2001
and the new enhanced Tier A will become effective March 8, 2002 following
an open enrollment period November 1, 2001 through January 31, 2002.
The agreement also includes
March 31, Cesar Chavez Day as a new, fixed holiday. The implementation
of this holiday is also contingent upon resolution of negotiations with
all employee unions so the County may close all facilities normally closed
on holidays.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The increased costs associated
with this contract are:
| |
| |
2001-2002
|
2002-2003
|
2003-2004
|
2004-2005
|
2005-2006
|
|
| Wages |
$20,825,316
|
$16,467,887
|
$13,376,282
|
$12,454,142
|
$12,870,175
|
|
| Health |
1,180,680
|
1,381,032
|
1,381,032
|
1,381,032
|
1,381,032
|
|
| Transportation |
353,920
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|
| Ret.
Offset |
994,596
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|
| Premiums/Uniforms |
233,703
|
386,548
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|
| TOTAL |
$23,588,215
|
$18,235,467
|
$14,757,314
|
$13,835,174
|
$14,251,207
|
|
| |
|
The implementation of
salary adjustments above will have no negative funding effect on
the County Employee Retirement System (CERS).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:
1. Approve introduction
(first reading) of ordinance; read title and waive further reading of
ordinance (MAJORITY VOTE):
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS
472 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT, AND
495 RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSEMENT.
Submit ordinance for further
Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on July 17, 2001.
2. Set July 17, 2001
as the date for consideration and approval of the ratified Memoranda of
Agreement between the County and the Service Employee's International
Union, Local 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC.
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob,
seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors found that the
need to take action arose subsequent to the Agenda being posted, adopted
appropriate Findings and placed the item on the agenda.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
17.1 ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox,
seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as
recommended, introducing ordinances for further Board consideration and
adoption on July 17, 2001.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater,
Roberts, Horn
18.
SUBJECT: OFF DOCKET ITEM:
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION
ORDINANCE RELATING TO TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR THE
PROBATION OFFICERS’ BARGAINING UNIT REPRESENTED BY SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL
UNION, LOCAL 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC
(Supv. Dist: All
)
OVERVIEW:
This action: 1) presents Compensation
Ordinance amendments for a first reading of negotiated provisions in
the Probation Officers’ (PO) Memorandum of Agreement between the County
and the Service Employees International Union, Local 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC
currently undergoing the ratification process; 2) adds additional steps
for specific classes; and 3) adds premiums and other benefits.
Tentative Agreement was reached
by County representatives with the Service Employees International Union,
Local 2028, AFL-CIO, CLC on July 3, 2001. The agreement is for a five-year
term.
The Tentative Agreement is
now undergoing the ratification process. On-site voting is under way
at County worksites and will continue until July 16, 2001. The Union
will inform the County of the results of the voting by noon on July 16.
The Memoranda of Agreement for all units that ratify will be presented
to your Board for consideration and approval on July 17, 2001.
The agreement includes, among
other wage and benefit improvements, major enhancements to employee retirement
benefits. The requirements of the 1937 Retirement Act makes the implementation
of retirement benefit improvements contingent upon the resolution of negotiations
with all employee unions in order to implement the improvements Countywide.
This could delay the date of implementation. However, if all contingencies
are met, the conversion of Tier II to Tier I will occur October 19, 2001
and the new enhanced Tier A will become effective March 8, 2002 following
an open enrollment period November 1, 2001 through January 31, 2002.
The agreement also includes
March 31, Cesar Chavez Day as a new, fixed holiday. The implementation
of this holiday is also contingent upon resolution of negotiations with
all employee unions so the
County may close all facilities normally closed on holidays.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The increased costs associated
with this contract are:
| |
2001-2002
|
2002-2003
|
2003-2004
|
2004-2005
|
2005-2006
|
| Wages |
$1,958,009
|
$1,818,772
|
$1,600,121
|
$1,577,791
|
$1,627,492
|
| Health |
133,440
|
155,856
|
155,856
|
155,856
|
155,856
|
| Transportation |
--
|
744,968
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
| Ret.
Offset |
1,004,567
|
196,541
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
| Premiums/Uniforms |
49,169
|
44,000
|
--
| |