|
STATEMENT
OF PROCEEDINGS
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING AND LAND USE MATTERS
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2001, 9:00 AM
Board of Supervisors North Chamber
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California
MORNING SESSION: - Meeting
was called to order at 9:04 a.m.
Present: Supervisors Bill
Horn, Chairman; Ron Roberts, Vice Chairman; Greg Cox; Dianne Jacob; also
Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.
ABSENT: Supervisor Pam Slater.
| Board
of Supervisors' Agenda Items |
|
1.
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
RICHLAND TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP- TPM 20481RPL2; NORTH COUNTY METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY PLANNING
AREA
|
|
2.
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
MORTON; GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT (GPA 99-03), ZONE RECLASSIFICATION (R98-007), ALPINE COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREA
|
|
3.
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
RANCHO CIELO: AMENDMENT
OF A LARGE SCALE PROJECT; SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SPA 98-001) AND
TENTATIVE MAP (TM 5146RPL2), SAN DIEGUITO PLANNING AREA
|
|
4.
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
EL APAJO ESTATES; ZONE
RECLASSIFICATION (R00-004), SAN DIEGUITO COMMUNITY PLAN
|
|
5.
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
RESCISSION OF AGRICULTURAL
ISSUES GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA 96-03, IMPLEMENTING REZONE R99-010,
CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
6.
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
POD 00-03; ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT RELATING TO THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED FOR ISSUANCE OF AN
ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT FOR A LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME FOR CHILDREN
|
|
7.
|
AMENDMENT TO THE SAN
DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW BOARD AND APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW BOARD
|
|
8.
|
REPORT FROM THE VALLEY
CENTER ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
|
|
9.
|
PURCHASE AND TRANSPORTATION
OF SOIL FOR THE SAN MARCOS II LANDFILL
|
|
10.
|
VALLEY CENTER LANDFILL:
VALLEY CENTER COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT LEASE TERMINATION SO NEW
LEASE CAN BE ISSUED
|
|
11.
|
ADVERTISEMENT OF A CONTRACT
FOR OLD HIGHWAY 80 RESURFACING
|
|
12.
|
TERMINATION OF AN IRREVOCABLE
OFFER OF DEDICATION (IOD) AND VACATION OF A ROAD EASEMENT FOR ROAD
SURVEY 1446 (VAC 00-001), RAMONA COMMUNITY PLANNING AREA
|
|
13.
|
AGREEMENTS WITH THREE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FIRMS TO PROVIDE SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED
BASIS
|
|
14.
|
AGREEMENTS WITH FOUR
CONSULTANT FIRMS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED
BASIS
|
|
15.
|
AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY AND COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION, MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE
OF WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS (ESCONDIDO CREEK, MANCHESTER PROPERTY
AND TIJUANA RIVER VALLEY)
|
|
16.
|
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID
AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - LINCOLN ACRES COMMUNITY CENTER/PARK
IMPROVEMENTS
|
|
17.
|
SET HEARING FOR 09/12/2001
SAN ELIJO LAGOON – ACQUISITION
OF PARCEL NO. 2001-0060-A (THE CITY OF ENCINITAS)
|
|
18.
|
SET HEARING FOR 09/12/2001
SANTA YSABEL RANCH –
ACQUISITION OF PARCEL NOS. 2000-0326-A AND 2000-0326-B (THE NATURE
CONSERVANCY)
|
|
19.
|
CLOSED SESSION
|
|
1.
|
SUBJECT:
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
RICHLAND TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP- TPM 20481RPL2; NORTH COUNTY METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY PLANNING
AREA (DISTRICT: 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This is an appeal filed
by the Twin Oaks Valley Sponsor Group of the Planning and Environmental
Review Board (PERB) approving Tentative Parcel Map 20481RPL2.
The 4.47-acre project site is located on Richland Road within the
North County Metropolitan Community Planning Area. The property
is zoned RR1 Rural Residential Use Regulation and is located within
the (1) Residential Land Use Designation.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW BOARD:
Deny the appeal and
adopt the Final Notice of Approval approving TPM 20481RPL2,
which makes the appropriate findings and includes those requirements
and conditions necessary to ensure that the project is implemented
in a manner consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance and State
law.
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND LAND USE:
The Department concurs
with the Planning and Environmental Review Board’s (PERB) recommendation.
|
| |
ACTION: |
| |
Amending the Department
of Planning and Land Use recommendation to read as follows: “The
Department concurs with the Planning and Environmental Review Board’s
(PERB) recommendation with an amendment to the Final Notice of Approval
to include the following condition: Under Section E, OTHER REQUIREMENTS,
No. 9: Prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, the subdivider
shall present written evidence to the Director of Public Works that
the subdivider has offered to improve the existing unlined drainage
ditch located along the north side of Richland Road from the westerly
boundary of Parcel 1 to Mulberry Drive with asphaltic concrete lining
to the satisfaction of the City of San Marcos;” ON MOTION of Supervisor
Horn, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors closed
the hearing and took action as recommended.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
SUBJECT:
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
MORTON; GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT (GPA 99-03), ZONE RECLASSIFICATION (R98-007), ALPINE COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREA (DISTRICT: 2)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This is a request for
a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99-03) to change the Land Use Designation
from the (17) Estate Residential to the (12) Neighborhood Commercial
and a concurrent Zone Reclassification (R98-007) to change the zoning
from the A70 (2) Limited Agriculture Use Regulations, 1 dwelling
unit per 2 acres, to the C32 Convenience Commercial Use Regulations
on this 1.2 acre site. The site is subject to the Estate Development
Area Regional Category. The site is within the Alpine Community
Plan area and is located at the southeast corner of the intersection
of Dunbar Lane and Chocolate Summit Drive, north of Interstate 8.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
PLANNING COMMISSION:
Adopt the Resolution
denying GPA 99-03 and Rezone 98-007 for the reasons stated
therein (Attachment B) and discussed in this report and the attached
Land Use Analysis (Attachment J).
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND LAND USE:
Concurs with the Planning
Commission.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors continued
this item to Wednesday, October 31, 2001, at the request of the
Chief Administrative Officer, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
SUBJECT:
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
RANCHO CIELO: AMENDMENT
OF A LARGE SCALE PROJECT; SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SPA 98-001) AND
TENTATIVE MAP (TM 5146RPL2), SAN DIEGUITO PLANNING AREA
(DISTRICT: 3)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This is a request for
an amendment (SPA 98-001) to the text and map of the Rancho Cielo
Specific Plan to accommodate development proposed by an associated
Tentative Map (TM 5146RPL2). The proposed amendment
and Tentative Map respond to the pipeline right-of-way acquisition
and construction by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District for
the Olivenhain Water Storage Project. The 150-foot-wide pipeline
right-of-way impacts seven Country Estate units designated within
the northwest portion of the Specific Plan Area and bisects the
designated Equestrian Center. The proposed amendment deletes the
seven impacted Country Estate units from the northwest portion of
the Specific Plan area and transfers two of the units to the designated
Equestrian Center site, located southwest of the intersection of
Paseo Esplanada and Via Ambiente. The Equestrian Center site will
be redesignated to Country Estate over the portion containing the
two relocated residential units (approximately 3.5 acres), and to
Community Recreation over the remainder portion to accommodate a
passive or active park (approximately 18 acres). The associated
Tentative Map proposes three lots: two Country Estate lots (minimum
lot size of one acre), and one lot containing the portion of the
proposed Community Recreation area lying outside of the pipeline
right-of-way. The portion of the site that contains the pipeline
right-of-way acquired by Olivenhain Municipal Water District in
fee title is included in the overall Community Recreation designation
on the Specific Plan, but is identified as “NOT A PART” on the Tentative
Map. No changes are proposed to the existing RR1 (Rural Residential,
1 dwelling unit per acre) and S80 (Open Space) zones.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
PLANNING COMMISSION
1.
Adopt the attached Resolution approving the amendment (SPA 98-001)
to the Rancho Cielo Specific Plan, which makes the appropriate findings
and includes those requirements and conditions necessary to ensure
that the project is implemented in a manner consistent with State
Law and the County General Plan.
2.
Adopt the attached Resolution approving TM 5146RPL2, which
makes the appropriate findings and includes those requirements and
conditions necessary to ensure that the project is implemented in
a manner consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance and State law.
|
| |
DEPARTMENT
OF PLANNING AND LAND USE:
The Department concurs
with the Planning Commission.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors closed
the hearing and took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting
the following Resolutions:
Resolution No. 01-241,
entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SPA 98-001, RANCHO CIELO; and
Resolution No. 01-242,
entitled: RESOLUTION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING
CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE MAP NO. 5146RPL2.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
4.
|
SUBJECT:
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
EL APAJO ESTATES;
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION (R00-004), SAN DIEGUITO COMMUNITY PLAN (DISTRICT:
3)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This is a request for
a Zone Reclassification (R00-004) for approximately 10 acres of
the 50.3 acre site from the S80, Open Space, Use Regulations to
the RR (1) Rural Residential regulations with a 1 acre minimum lot
size. The Planning Commission approved the Tentative Map (TM 5201RPL2)
and the Administrative Permit (AD 00‑015) for the project
on June 15, 2001. The Tentative Map will subdivide the 50.3
acres into 14 residential lots averaging 1.5 acres in size and 1
open space lot of 27 acres. The Administrative Permit requires
formation of a Homeowners Association for maintenance of common
walls and landscaping and authorizes pilasters to be 76 inches in
height, the entry structure on the private entrance to be 14 feet
in height and an emergency access gate entry onto El Apajo Road.
The site is in the (21) Specific Plan Land Use Designation with
a maximum density of .33 dwelling units per acre. The site is north
of El Apajo and west of Via de Santa Fe in the El Apajo Specific
Plan in the San Dieguito Planning Area.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
PLANNING COMMISSION:
Adopt the Ordinance
(R00-004) approving a change from the S80, Open Space Use Regulations,
to (P) Provisional RR1 Rural Residential Use Regulations, 1 dwelling
unit per acre with other designators shown in the Ordinance
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND LAND USE:
Concurs with the Planning
Commission.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors closed
the hearing and took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting
Ordinance No. 9376 (N.S.), entitled: AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY R00-004.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
SUBJECT:
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
RESCISSION OF AGRICULTURAL
ISSUES GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA 96-03, IMPLEMENTING REZONE R99-010,
CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
(DISTRICTS: ALL)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
The Supplemental Writ
of Mandate issued by the court in Save Our Forest and Ranchlands
v. County of San Diego (Case No. 676630) orders the Board of Supervisors
to vacate and rescind the following actions: the approval of GPA
96-03 and implementing Rezone R99-010, the certification of the
Environmental Impact Report for the project, and the approval of
the California Environmental Quality Act Findings Concerning Mitigation
of Significant Effects of the Project and the Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
This project was a publicly
initiated amendment to the Regional Land Use Element, Conservation
Element and Open Space Element, community and subregional texts
and maps of the County General Plan and the related implementing
Rezone. The project was undertaken in response to a writ of mandate
issued by the court on January 24, 1996.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
|
|
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND LAND USE:
1. Rescind the Board’s
April 5, 2000 action:
a. Certifying that
the Final Environmental Impact Report for Agricultural Issues General
Plan Amendment and Implementing Rezone (GPA 96-03) dated January
24, 2000 has been
completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA);
b. Approving the CEQA
Findings Concerning Mitigation of Significant Effects of the Project;
and
c. Approving the
Statement of Overriding Considerations.
2. Adopt the Resolution
rescinding Resolution No. 00-99 that adopted GPA 96-03.
3. Adopt the Ordinance
rescinding Ordinance No. 9143 that adopted Rezone R99-010,
a classification of property in the (20) Agricultural Preserve Land
Use Designation.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors continued
this item to Tuesday, September 18, 2001, at the request of the
Chief Administrative Officer, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
SUBJECT:
|
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING:
POD 00-03; ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT RELATING TO THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED FOR ISSUANCE
OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT FOR A LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME FOR
CHILDREN (DISTRICTS: ALL)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
The project is an amendment
to Zoning Ordinance Section 6156.y to augment and revise the specific
conditions relating to spacing and concentration, noise control,
traffic control, parking, fire safety and on-site sewage disposal
under which an Administrative Permit can be issued to allow a Large
Family Day Care Home for Children as an accessory use to a residence.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
N/A
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
PLANNING COMMISSION:
That the Board of Supervisors
take the following actions:
1.
Find that the proposed project has been determined to be exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act as specified under
Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines because The Zoning Ordinance will continue to require
approval of an Administrative Permit before a Large Family Day Care
Home can be established and operated. Because The Zoning Ordinance
will continue to specify that certain conditions relating to spacing
and concentration, noise control, traffic control, parking, fire
safety and on-site sewage disposal must be complied with before
the Administrative Permit can be issued the project does not have
the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment
(Attachment B).
2.
Adopt the attached Form of Ordinance (Attachment A): “AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED
FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT FOR A LARGE FAMILY DAY
CARE HOME FOR CHILDREN”
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER:
Concurs with the Planning
Commission.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors closed
the hearing and took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting
Ordinance No. 9377 (N.S.), entitled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED FOR ISSUANCE OF AN
ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT FOR A LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME FOR CHILDREN.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
SUBJECT:
|
AMENDMENT TO THE
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE PLANNING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD AND APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD (DISTRICTS: ALL)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This is a request to
amend the San Diego County Administrative Code relating to staffing
of the Planning and Environmental Review Board and to make new assignments
to the Planning and Environmental Review Board. This request is
being made to ensure adequate staffing and because of changes in
assignments, staffing and employee turnover in the Department of
Planning and Land Use.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
No funding is required.
If approved, this request will result in $0.00 current year cost,
$0.00 annual cost, and will require the addition of 0 staff years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER:
1. Approve
the introduction of the Ordinance, (first reading), read title and
waive further reading of the Ordinance:
“AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD”
Submit the Ordinance
for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on
September 12, 2001.
2. Appoint
Timothy Popejoy, Regional Planner, to replace Rose Blake as the
Second Alternate Planning Member on the Planning and Environmental
Review Board.
3. Appoint
Robert Asher, Chief, to serve as the Third Alternate Planning Member
on the Planning and Environmental Review Board, appointment to take
effect 30 days from adoption of the Ordinance creating the Third
Alternate Member.
4. Appoint
Thomas Oberbauer, Environmental Resource Manager, to replace Kiersten
Guigno as the First Alternate Environmental Member on the Planning
and Environmental Review Board.
5. Appoint
Mark Webb, Senior Park Project Manager, to replace Thomas Oberbauer
as the Second Alternate Environmental Member on the Planning and
Environmental Review Board.
6. Appoint
Kaylene Fleming, Environmental Management Specialist, to serve as
the Third Alternate Environmental Member on the Planning and Environmental
Review Board, appointment to take effect 30 days from adoption of
the Ordinance creating the Third Alternate Member.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent, introducing Ordinance for further
Board consideration and adoption on September 12, 2001.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Roberts,
Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
SUBJECT:
|
REPORT FROM THE VALLEY
CENTER ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (DISTRICT: 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
On May 4, 1999 (2),
the Board of Supervisors approved a $40,000 Community Development
Block Grant to establish a Revitalization Advisory Committee for
the Valley Center community, hold outreach meetings to assess community
concerns, and conduct a preliminary review to identify resources
available to resolve problems raised by the community .
The Board is requested
to receive the report entitled “Fresh Ideas from Valley Center”.
This is an informational report and is the culmination of community
outreach and the efforts of the Valley Center Economic Revitalization
Advisory Committee. The report includes the recommendations of
the Committee and the strategy for implementing economic revitalization
programs. It is proposed this report be forwarded to the Valley
Center Community Planning Group for their consideration as they
work on the General Plan 2020 update and as they recommend priorities
for Valley Center in the future. It is also recommended that since
committee has completed their assignment, it should be disbanded
with appreciation given for their efforts on behalf of Valley Center.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
There is no fiscal impact
associated with receiving the report from the Valley Center Economic
Revitalization Advisory Committee.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER:
1. Receive
the report entitled “Fresh Ideas From Valley Center.”
2. Forward the report
to the Valley Center Community Planning Group for their consideration.
3. Disband the Valley
Center Economic Revitalization Advisory Committee in accordance
with Board of Supervisors Policy A-74, Citizen Participation in
County Boards, Commissions and Committees with appreciation for
their service.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
SUBJECT:
|
PURCHASE AND TRANSPORTATION
OF SOIL FOR THE SAN MARCOS II LANDFILL (DISTRICT: 5)
(4 VOTES)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
The County Solid Waste
Management group maintains the soil cover for the San Marcos II
Landfill, a 230-acre site with 107 acres of landfilled area that
stopped operations in 1997. A specific type of clay-like soil with
low permeability is needed at the Landfill to prevent water infiltration,
as part of ongoing maintenance. This type of soil is scarce and
difficult to procure in sufficient quantities. Staff has located
a large quantity of this soil available at the Ocean Ranch development,
being developed by Ivy Ranch Development Company in the City of
Oceanside, California.
This request is to approve
sole source procurement of 150,000 cubic yards of clay soil for
transport to the landfill for ongoing maintenance needs. With Board
approval, the Director of Purchasing and Contracting would negotiate
this purchase at a fair and reasonable price. The Board is also
requested to approve establishment of appropriations in the amount
of $1,950,000 into the Inactive Waste Site Management Fund for purchase
and transport of the clay soil to San Marcos II Landfill.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Funds for this request
are available in the Solid Waste Environmental Trust Fund. Establishment
of appropriations will result in adequate funding for the unanticipated
purchase and transport of clay soil. If approved, this request will
result in current year cost of up to $1,950,000, no subsequent year
cost and will require no additional staff years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1.
Find that pursuant to Section 15301 of the State California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines that the procurement of clay soils for the
San Marcos II landfill is not subject to the environmental review
process, because there will be no increase in existing use, and
the soil will be used to prevent water infiltration.
2.
Establish appropriations in the amount of $1,950,000 in Inactive
Waste Site Management Org 5711, Activity 355416, Account 2290 ($600,000)
and Account 2330 ($1,350,000) based on funds available in the Solid
Waste Environmental Trust Fund. (4 VOTES)
3.
In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize
the Director of Department of Purchasing and Contracting to negotiate
with Ivy Ranch Development Company; and subject to determination
of fair and reasonable pricing and terms, award a contract for purchase
of specialized soil for an amount not to exceed $600,000, subject
to approval of the Director, Department of Public Works.
4.
Find that it is in the County's best interest to conduct a competitive
procurement for trucking of this soil purchase to the San Marcos
II Landfill.
|
|
|
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board of Supervisors waived
Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, and directed the Chief
Administrative Officer to try to negotiate with Burns & Sons
to see if a fair and reasonable agreement can be reached and if
such an agreement cannot be reached, then directed the Chief Administrative
Officer to proceed with the procurement process, and to return to
the Board.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
SUBJECT:
|
VALLEY CENTER LANDFILL:
VALLEY CENTER COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT LEASE TERMINATION SO NEW
LEASE CAN BE ISSUED (DISTRICT: 5)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
On January 8, 1985 (8),
the Board approved a 30-year lease with the Valley Center Community
Services District for equestrian use of the County’s inactive Valley
Center Landfill. For the reasons stated below, County Counsel has
recommended that it would be prudent to replace the existing lease
with a new lease for a shorter term and with terms and conditions
to address potential regulatory issues. Since the original lease
was executed, solid waste facility regulations have changed. The
new short-term lease will accommodate potential need for regulatory
compliance activities by the County, and will provide additional
indemnification and insurance protection for the County.
This letter is a request
to terminate the original 30-year lease so that a new lease can
be issued. The new short-term lease can be executed by the County's
Lease Administrator because the term is for less than ten years.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
If approved, this action
will result in no current year cost and will require no additional
staff years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find
in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines it can be seen with certainty there
is no possibility this project may have a significant effect on
the environment and is therefore not subject to CEQA.
2. Authorize
the Director, Department of General Services, to terminate the 30-year
lease agreement between the County and the Valley Center Community
Services District.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
SUBJECT:
|
ADVERTISEMENT OF
A CONTRACT FOR OLD HIGHWAY 80 RESURFACING (DISTRICT: 2)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
On June 15, 1999 (19),
the Board approved an amendment to the TransNet Program and Regional
Transportation Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 1998/99 through
2003/04, which included six new road pavement rehabilitation projects
funded with $2.9 million in federal Transportation Equity Act-21
(TEA-21) funds. One of these projects is resurfacing sections of
Old Highway 80 asphalt shoulders, from Cattle Guard 2 to Mile Post
34, in the vicinities of Buckman Springs and Jacumba. Resurfacing
of the shoulders will restore the structural integrity and prevent
future costly road repair.
This is a request to
approve and authorize advertisement of a contract to resurface approximately
10 miles of Old Highway 80 asphalt shoulders and perform some minor
road repairs. Once Caltrans provides necessary fiscal information,
staff will return to the Board with a recommendation to award a
contract.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
This project is scheduled
in the Department of Public Works' Detailed Work Program, and will
be funded utilizing a combination of federal funding and savings
realized in FY 2000-01 resurfacing monies. The project is currently
estimated at approximately $2.3 million; a more detailed fiscal
statement will be presented when the project returns to the Board
for contract award.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find
in accordance with Section 15301 of California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines that this project is categorically exempt
from provisions of the Guidelines, since it consists of maintenance
of existing facilities with no increase in capacity.
2. Authorize
the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to advertise,
as authorized by Section 403 of the Administrative Code, for this
contract for public works project.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Jacob seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended.
AYES: Cox, Jacob Roberts,
Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
SUBJECT:
|
TERMINATION OF AN
IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION (IOD) AND VACATION OF A ROAD EASEMENT
FOR ROAD SURVEY 1446 (VAC 00-001), RAMONA COMMUNITY PLANNING AREA
(DISRTRICT: 2)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
Road Survey 1446 contains
County right of way 60 feet in width and approximately 1,100 feet
in length, originally intended to provide a connection road between
State Route 78 and Old Julian Highway, approximately 1.25 miles
east of Magnolia Avenue. The connection was previously on the County’s
Circulation Element, however it was deleted from the County’s Circulation
Element in 1987. The Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and road easement
are no longer needed for public use.
This is a request to
adopt the Resolution of Summary Vacation to terminate an Irrevocable
Offer of Dedication and to vacate a road easement that lie on a
portion of Road Survey 1446 in the community of Ramona.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT:
N/A
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1.
Find the project as proposed is categorically exempt from provisions
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA
Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) which
includes changes that do not affect land use or density. Proposal
is a road vacation that will not result in any significant environmental
effects, such as damage to scenic, historical, or cultural resources,
is not located on a documented hazardous waste site, and will not
result in any cumulative environmental impact.
2.
Find that the proposed termination/vacation permitted by the application
is consistent with the provisions of the Resource Protection Ordinance.
3.
Adopt a Resolution entitled Resolution of Summary Vacation and Termination
of Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for Road Survey 1446.
4.
Direct the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to record this Resolution
pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8330.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob , the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution No. 01-243,
entitled: RESOLUTION OF SUMMARY VACATION AND TERMINATION OF IRREVOCABLE
OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR ROAD SURVEY 1446.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
SUBJECT:
|
AGREEMENTS WITH THREE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FIRMS TO PROVIDE SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED
BASIS (DISTRICTS: ALL) [FUNDING SOURCE: TRANSNET]
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
The Department of Public
Works has a need for consultant services on an immediate and temporary
basis for environmental studies. These consultants may also be used
for environmental studies for other County departments. Use of consultants
will enhance the department’s ability to complete environmental
reviews and mitigation requirements in a timely manner.
Public agencies in California
must use a Qualifications Based Selection method to contract for
consultant services. This method requires such services be engaged
on basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for types
of services to be performed at a fair and reasonable cost. Board
Policy F-40 (Procuring Architectural, Engineering and Related Professional
Services) describes the County’s method for Qualifications Based
Selection. In accordance with provisions of the policy, the selection
committee interviewed six consultant firms from the Joint County/City
of San Diego list for Environmental Services. Three firms were
selected as the most qualified firms to perform required services:
HDR Engineering, Inc.; EDAW Environmental (formerly KEA); and P&D
Consultants.
This is a request to
approve agreements with these firms to provide as-needed environmental
services for fees not to exceed $250,000 each, with terms ending
July 30, 2004. The agreements authorize the Director, Department
of Public Works to extend the termination date until funds are exhausted
and to adjust allowable billing rates on an annual basis to mutually
agreed upon fair and reasonable rates.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
This proposal is budgeted
in the FY 2001-02 Department of Public Works Program. Funding source
is identified as TransNet; all non-TransNet projects undertaken
under this agreement will be reimbursed from appropriate funding
source. If approved, this request will result in current year cost
of $750,000, no annual cost and will require no additional staff
years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
|
|
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find,
pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines, requested actions are exempt from CEQA because
it can be
seen with certainty there is no possibility the activity in question
may have a significant effect on the environment.
2. Approve
and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, three
originals each of the following agreements:
a) An Agreement
with HDR Engineering, Inc., to provide environmental services on
an as-needed basis for compensation not to exceed $250,000. Agreement
to terminate July 30, 2004 or when funds are exhausted or services
are no longer required, whichever shall occur first, with option
to extend termination date by written mutual agreement if original
funding remains available.
b) An Agreement
with EDAW Environmental (formerly KEA), to provide environmental
services on an as-needed basis for compensation not to exceed $250,000.
Agreement to terminate July 30, 2004 or when funds are exhausted
or services are no longer required, whichever shall occur first,
with option to extend termination date by written mutual agreement
if original funding remains available.
c) An Agreement
with P&D Consultants, to provide environmental services on an
as-needed basis for compensation not to exceed $250,000. Agreement
to terminate July 30, 2004 or when funds are exhausted or services
are no longer required, whichever shall occur first, with option
to extend termination date by written mutual agreement if original
funding remains available.
3. Designate
the Director, Department of Public Works, as County Officer responsible
for administering the agreements.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
SUBJECT:
|
AGREEMENTS WITH FOUR
CONSULTANT FIRMS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED
BASIS (DISTRICTS: ALL) [FUNDING SOURCE: TRANSNET]
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
In recent years, San
Diego County has experienced a surge in development and population
growth, requiring major infrastructure improvements. This has impacted
the need for public works projects. The Department of Public Works
has necessity for consultant services on an as-needed basis to provide
supplemental design engineering services for various Department
of Public Works projects. Use of consultants enhances the department’s
ability to complete project designs in a timely manner.
Public agencies in California
must use a Qualifications Based Selection method to contract for
consultant services. This method requires such services be engaged
on basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for types
of services to be performed at a fair and reasonable cost. Board
Policy F-40 (Procuring Architectural, Engineering and Related Professional
Services) describes the County’s method for Qualifications Based
Selection. In accordance with provisions of the policy, seven consultant
firms from the joint County/City of San Diego list for Civil Engineering
were interviewed. Four firms were selected as the most qualified
firms to perform required services: Nolte Associates, Inc.; P&D
Consultants, Inc.; Boyle Engineering Corp.; and BRW Inc.
This is a request to
approve agreements with these firms to provide as-needed engineering
design services for fees not to exceed $250,000 each, with a term
ending June 30, 2004. The agreements authorize the Director, Department
of Public Works to extend the termination date until funds are exhausted
and to adjust allowable billing rates on an annual basis to mutually
agreed upon fair and reasonable rates.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
This proposal is budgeted
in the FY 2001-02 Department of Public Works Program. Funding source
is identified as TransNet; all non-TransNet projects undertaken
under this agreement will be reimbursed from the appropriate funding
source. If approved, this request will result in current year cost
of $1 million, no annual cost and will require no additional staff
years.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1.
Find pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, requested actions are exempt from
CEQA because it can be seen with certainty there is no possibility
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.
2.
Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt,
three originals for each of the following agreements:
a)
An Agreement with Nolte Associates, Inc., to provide engineering
design services on an as-needed basis for compensation not to exceed
$250,000. Agreement to terminate June 30, 2004, or when funds are
exhausted or services are no longer required, whichever shall occur
first, with option to extend termination dates by written mutual
agreement if original funding remains available.
b)
An Agreement with P&D Consultants, Inc., to provide engineering
design services on an as-needed basis for compensation not to exceed
$250,000. Agreement to terminate June 30, 2004 or when funds are
exhausted or services are no longer required, whichever shall occur
first, with option to extend termination dates by written mutual
agreement if original funding remains available.
c)
An Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corp., to provide engineering
design services on an as-needed basis for compensation not to exceed
$250,000. Agreement to terminate June 30, 2004 or when funds are
exhausted or services are no longer required, whichever shall occur
first, with option to extend termination dates by written mutual
agreement if original funding remains available.
d)
An Agreement with BRW Inc., to provide engineering design services
on an as-needed basis for compensation not to exceed $250,000. Agreement
to terminate June 30, 2004 or when funds are exhausted or services
are no longer required, whichever shall occur first, with option
to extend termination dates by written mutual agreement if original
funding remains available.
3.
Designate the Director, Department of Public Works, as County Officer
responsible for administering the agreements.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Roberts,
Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
SUBJECT:
|
AUTHORIZATION TO
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
AND COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION, MONITORING
AND MAINTENANCE OF WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS (ESCONDIDO CREEK, MANCHESTER
PROPERTY AND TIJUANA RIVER VALLEY) (DISTRICTS: 1,3)
|
| |
OVERVIEW:
The recommended action will authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
to execute an agreement between the County of San Diego and the County
Water Authority (CWA) for the acquisition and long-term management
of up to 41 acres of Escondido Creek properties near the community
of Elfin Forest, for construction, maintenance and monitoring of wetland
habitat within the San Elijo Lagoon Ecological Reserve (including
the 18.9-acre Manchester Property which is currently owned by the
City of Encinitas) and Tijuana River Valley Regional Park. |
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Funds for the acquisition
of the Escondido Creek Upland properties will be provided by the
CWA. The long-term management of the property will be provided
by the County as part of the Escondido Creek Preserve. Operations
and maintenance will be conducted utilizing existing budgeted resources
within the Parks and Recreation Department. There will be no cost
to the General Fund resulting from this action.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find in accordance
with Sections 15304(d) and 15325 of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines that these actions are categorically exempt
from CEQA.
2. Authorize the Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors to execute, upon receipt and with the approval
of County Counsel, an agreement between the County of San Diego
and the County Water Authority (CWA) for the acquisition and long-term
management of up to 41 acres of Escondido Creek Upland properties,
and instruction, maintenance and monitoring of wetland habitat
within the San Elijo Lagoon Ecological Reserve (including the 18.9-acre
Manchester Property), and Tijuana River Valley Regional Park.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
SUBJECT:
|
ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BID AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - LINCOLN ACRES COMMUNITY
CENTER/PARK IMPROVEMENTS (DISTRICT: 1)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This action will approve
contract documents and authorize advertisement for public bidding
and award of a construction contract estimated at $110,265, including
10% contingency for community center/park improvements at Lincoln
Acres Park to include re-roofing the entire community center building,
replacing the park water system, and relocating the water heater
and vent. In addition, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements
to remove access barriers include reconstruction of ramps and front
deck, as well as installation of ADA compliant fixtures and door
hardware, restroom improvements, and related improvements. Remaining
project funds are being used for related project costs including
design, resident engineering and inspection services, project administration,
materials testing and bid process.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
Funds for this request
are budgeted in Capital Project KN0786. The funding sources are
Fiscal Year 1998-1999 and mid-year allocations from Fiscal Year
2000-2001 Community Development Block Grant funds. If approved,
this action will result in approximately $110,265 current year cost
to award the contract, $0 annual cost, and will require the addition
of no staff years. Maintenance and operations of the improved facilities
will be managed utilizing existing resources within the Parks and
Recreation Department budget. There will be no cost to the General
Fund resulting from this action.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1. Find
in accordance with Section 15301 of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines that the proposed project is categorically
exempt from CEQA.
2. Authorize
the Director of the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to
take any action authorized by Section 403 of the Administrative
Code with respect to contracting for the subject public works project.
3. Designate
the Director, Department of Parks and Recreation, as the County
officer responsible for administering the contract.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Roberts,
Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
17.
|
SUBJECT:
|
SET HEARING FOR 09/12/2001
SAN ELIJO LAGOON
- ACQUISITION OF PARCEL NO. 2001-0060-A (THE CITY OF ENCINITAS (DISTRICT:
3)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
|
|
On December 13, 2000
(14), the Board authorized staff to seek and identify potential
sources of funding for the acquisition of property within the Escondido
Creek floodplain and adjacent to the San Elijo Lagoon Ecological
Reserve. County staff has secured a $1,000,000 Grant from the Wetlands
Recovery Program and $800,000 from the Parks Bond Act Grant.
The City of Encinitas
owns an 18.9-acre parcel which they had originally planned to develop
as a sports park. The City no longer plans to construct the park
and has offered the property to the County for the appraised value
of $1,800,000.
The Board is requested
to set a hearing for September 12, 2001 to consider the acquisition
of Parcel No. 2001-0060-A from the City of Encinitas.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
This is a request to
set a hearing date to consider the purchase of Parcel No. 2001-0060-A.
Also included in this action is the appropriation of $1,800,000
which will fund the purchase of the property. The funding sources
are Wetlands Recovery Program and 2000 Parks Bond Act grant funds.
Should the purchase of the San Elijo Lagoon property be approved
on September 12, 2001, the action will result in a current year
cost of $1,800,000, no annual cost, and will not require additional
staff years. There will be no cost to the General Fund resulting
from this action.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
| |
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1.
Direct the Clerk of the Board to publish the required Notice of
Intention to Purchase Parcel No. 2001-0060-A in accordance with
Government Code Sections 6063 and 25350.
2.
Set this matter for September 12, 2001 at which time the Board of
Supervisors may consummate the purchase of Parcel No. 2001-0060-A.
3.
Approve and authorize the establishment of appropriations in the
amount of $1,000,000 in Capital Project KA1971, San Elijo Acquisitions,
based on awarded Wetlands Recovery Program grant funds. (4VOTES)
4.
Approve and authorize the establishment of appropriations in the
amount of $800,000 in Capital Project KA1971, San Elijo Acquisitions,
based on awarded 2000 Parks Bond Act grant funds. (4VOTES)
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent, setting this matter for Hearing
on September 12, 2001, 9:00 a.m.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Slater, Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
SUBJECT:
|
SET HEARING FOR 09/12/2001
SANTA YSABEL RANCH
– ACQUISITION OF PARCEL NOS. 2000-0326-A AND 2000-0326-B (THE NATURE
CONSERVANCY) (DISTRICT 2)
|
| |
OVERVIEW: |
| |
This is a request to
set a hearing to consider the purchase of two parcels totaling approximately
5,300 acres of land in Santa Ysabel, near Julian.
On November 10, 1999(6),
the Board approved a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant
application to Caltrans for a Transportation Enhancement Activities
(TEA) grant.
On December 13, 2000(13),
the Board approved a resolution authorizing the application and
acceptance of Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) grant funds from
Proposition 13. These applications were approved by the granting
agencies on March 16, 2001 and March 1, 2001, respectively.
The Nature Conservancy
is the current owner of the Santa Ysabel Ranch and has offered it
to the County for appraised value.
The Board is requested
to set a hearing for September 12, 2001 to consider the purchase
of Parcel No. 2000-0326-A for $3,000,000 and 2000-0326-B for $6,100,000.
|
| |
FISCAL
IMPACT: |
| |
This is a request to
set the hearing date for the purchase of the Santa Ysabel Ranch
property. Funding for the purchase of this property is not budgeted.
Funds in the amount of $9,100,00 are being appropriated in the Capital
Outlay Fund in this action. Sources of funding are the Wildlife
Conservation Board and Transportation Enhancement Activities grant
funds. Should the purchase of Santa Ysabel Ranch property be approved
on September 12, 2001, this action will result in current year costs
of $9,100,00, no annual cost, and will not require additional staff
years. There will be no cost to the General Fund resulting from
this action.
|
| |
RECOMMENDATION: |
|
|
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
1.
Approve and authorize the establishment of appropriations in the
amount of $6.1 million in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project
KA2972 - Santa Ysabel Ranch Acquisitions, based on awarded Wildlife
Conservation Board grant funds. (4
VOTES)
2.
Approve and authorize the establishment of appropriations in the
amount of $3 million in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project
KA2972 - Santa Ysabel Ranch Acquisitions, based on awarded Transportation
Enhancement Activities grant funds. (4 VOTES)
3.
Direct the Clerk of the Board to publish the Notice of Intention
to Purchase Parcel No. 2000-0326-A and 2000-0326-B in accordance
with Government Code Sections 25350 and 6063.
4.
Set this matter for September 12, 2001 at which time the Board of
Supervisors may consummate the purchase of Parcel Nos. 2000-0326-A
and 2000-0326-B.
|
| |
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor
Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took
action as recommended, on Consent, setting this matter for hearing
on September 12, 2001, 9:00 a.m.
AYES: Cox, Jacob,
Roberts, Horn
ABSENT: Slater
|
|
19.
|
SUBJECT: CLOSED
SESSION
A. CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Therese Rendt, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al.; San Diego
Superior Court No.
GIC 757403
B. CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Ardis Peery v. County
of San Diego, et al.; San Diego Superior Court No.GIC 752677
C. CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Stapel v. San Diego County
Employees Retirement Association (“SDCERA”),Superior Court No. 722450;
Scheidel v. SDCERA, Superior Court No. 725666; Deputy Sheriffs Association
v. SDCERA, Superior Court No. 725984
D. CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – THREATENED LITIGATION
Anticipated litigation
pursuant to section (b) of Government Code section 54956.9
No. of Potential Cases:
1
E. CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – THREATENED LITIGATION
Anticipated litigation
pursuant to section (b) of Government Code section 54956.9
No. of Potential Cases:
1
F. CONFERENCE
WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Designated Representatives:
Carlos Arauz, Madge Blakey and Mike Kolb
Employee Organizations:
Deputy District Attorneys Association and Deputy Public Defenders
Association
|
|
|
G. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: County
Counsel
H. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Chief
Administrative Officer
|
| |
ACTION:
County Counsel reported
the following action on Item B, by vote of all 5 members of the
Board of Supervisors present and voting "aye", the Board
authorized settlement, up to $235,000, in return for the plaintiff's
dismissal of her lawsuit against the County.
|
There being no further business,
the Board adjourned at 10:02 a.m.
THOMAS J.
PASTUSZKA
Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors
County of San Diego, State of California
Notes by: Lampley
NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings
sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors
on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence
in which the matters were taken up.
|