1.

PROGRESS REPORT: GENERAL PLAN 2020

2.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FIRE CODE PORTION OF THE COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES AND RATIFYING A CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE SHOWING ALL AMENDMENTS BY LOCAL FIRE DISTRICTS TO THE FIRE CODE PORTION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE

3.

AGREEMENT WITH CONSULTANT FIRM TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS

[FUNDING SOURCE(S): TRANSNET]

4.

GILLESPIE FIELD – AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN NARRATIVE REPORT: EXECUTE CONSULTANT AGREEMENT

[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (AIP) ($135,000), CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS PROGRAM ($6,750), AND AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND ($33,250)]

5.

AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR AND ACCEPT GRANTS FROM VARIOUS FUNDING PROGRAMS FOR VARIOUS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECTS 

6.

ACCEPTANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL GRANT

[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FOR FY 2001-2002 IS A GRANT FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL]

(4 VOTES)

7.

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:

SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES: TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

8.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

1.

SUBJECT:

PROGRESS REPORT: GENERAL PLAN 2020

(DISTRICTS: ALL)

On May 23, 2001 (10), the Board of Supervisors directed the Chief Administrative Officer and the Interest Group to report back on incorporating Concepts A, B, C and D into the General Plan and to obtain information from Planning and Sponsor Groups on updates to their respective Community Plans.  This is a progress report on the status of that Board direction.  This report also includes an update on Interest Group and Steering Committee activities, and community outreach efforts.  The General Plan update is intended to accommodate projected population growth and plan for development, infrastructure needs and resource preservation in the unincorporated areas to the year 2020. 

There is no fiscal impact associated with this progress report.

RECOMMENDATION:

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:

1.  Receive this report.

2.  Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to return with a progress report in January 2002.

ON MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, directed that the Interest Groups continue for the duration of the project.

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn

2.

SUBJECT:

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FIRE CODE PORTION OF THE COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES AND RATIFYING A CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE SHOWING ALL AMENDMENTS BY LOCAL FIRE DISTRICTS TO THE FIRE CODE PORTION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (DISTRICTS: ALL)

When a fire district board of directors adopts an ordinance more stringent than the State Building Standards Code, Health and Safety Code section 13869.7 states that the legislative body of the municipality must ratify the ordinance before it can become effective.  It is the intent of the State law that the legislative body officially approves the fire districts’ ordinances to ensure that each one is consistent and conforms to the goals of the legislative body.  The legislative body for fire districts in the unincorporated area is the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors.

Each of the seventeen fire districts that serve the unincorporated area has adopted an ordinance requiring ratification.  The Department of Planning and Land Use has reviewed each of the fire districts’ ordinances to determine if they should be recommended for ratification, amendment or denial.  In conjunction with this review, County staff worked closely with representatives from each fire district to create uniformity among all the districts’ fire codes and reduce the number of individual code amendments.  This resulted in many fire districts’ codes being amended to produce greater uniformity in the ratified fire code.  The districts worked with County staff and their efforts resulted in a large reduction in the number of code sections that were amended by the fire districts (from 31 to 7).

Additionally, as a result of this review process staff is recommending that three of the amendments adopted by the fire districts should be considered for inclusion in the County Fire Code as follows:

1.      Require fire sprinkler systems for hotels, apartments, and congregate residences with between 3 to 15 units; and,

2.      Add fire prevention requirements for greenwaste recycling facilities; and,

3.      Allow above ground storage tanks for up to 550 gallons of crankcase oil.

Staff is also recommending an amendment to the Board of Appeals section of the County Fire Code as a result of negotiations with the Building Industry Association.

These 4 proposed amendments and the fire district amendments recommended for ratification have been combined with the current County Fire Code to create a Consolidated Fire Code for use across the entire unincorporated area.  If approved, the Consolidated Fire Code will ratify the ordinances of 17 fire districts and benefit Department of Planning and Land Use customers by greatly simplifying the building design process related to fire prevention throughout the unincorporated area.  The Consolidated Fire Code will also enable Department of Planning and Land Use to further streamline the plan check process by allowing the review of the fire code portion of residential plans by County staff instead of sending customers to the fire districts.  Industry is very supportive of this since it will streamline the process and facilitate consistent enforcement and interpretation of fire codes throughout the unincorporated area.

Additionally, it is requested that the Board approve an amendment to Board Policy F-48, Review of Fire District Ordinances which contain Requirements that Exceed those of the State Fire Marshal, to reflect current organizational structure of the Department of Planning and Land Use.

There is no fiscal impact associated with these recommendations.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:

The adoption of the County Fire Code amendments and the ratification of the Consolidated Fire Code proposed in this letter would benefit the business community by improving customer service by reducing the number of local amendments to the State Fire Code and enhancing more consistent fire code enforcement throughout the unincorporated area.  In addition, the plan check process will be streamlined in those fire districts where Department of Planning and Land Use staff is the primary contact for fire related plan review.

RECOMMENDATION:

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:

1.   Find in accordance with section 15061 (b)(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the following action may have a significant effect on the environment.

2.  Approve findings that document that the County amendments to the 1998 California Fire Code are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geographical or topographical conditions, pursuant to section 17958 of the California Health and Safety Code.

3.   Approve the introduction of the Ordinance, (first reading), read title & waive further reading of the Ordinance:

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FIRE CODE PORTION OF THE COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES AND RATIFYING A CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE SHOWING ALL AMENDMENTS BY LOCAL FIRE DISTRICTS TO THE FIRE CODE PORTION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE

Submit the Ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on October 10, 2001.

4.   Direct the Clerk of the Board to provide a certified copy of the ordinance, together with the adopted findings for the amendments to the County Code, and each of the ratified fire district ordinances which contain the associated findings made by each fire district, on file with the Clerk of the Board, to the California Building Standards Commission pursuant to California Health and Safety Code sections 13869.7 (c) and 17958.7.

5.  Approve amendment for Board of Supervisors Policy F-48, Review of Fire District Ordinances which contain Requirements that Exceed those of the State Fire Marshal.

ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors, continued this item to Wednesday, October 10, 2001; directed the Chief Administrative Officer to bring language back that would reflect the appeal process in the State code and other options as appropriate, and to continue to work with various parties.

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn

3.

SUBJECT:

AGREEMENT WITH CONSULTANT FIRM TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (DISTRICT: ALL)

The Department of Public Works contracts transportation planning services on an as-needed basis for various land development projects. Use of consultants enhances the department’s ability to complete project reviews, and provide plan check services to private developers in a timely manner even during large fluctuations in workflow.

Public agencies in California must use a Qualifications Based Selection method to contract for consultant services.  This method requires such services be engaged on basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for types of services to be performed at a fair and reasonable cost.  Board Policy F-40, Procuring Architectural, Engineering and Related Professional Services, describes the County’s method for Qualifications Based Selection.  In accordance with provisions of the policy, six consultant firms from the joint County/City of San Diego list for Planning Services were invited to interview.  BRW Inc. was selected as the most qualified firm to perform required services.

This is a request to approve an agreement with the firm to provide as-needed transportation planning services for fees not to exceed $250,000, with a term ending August 1, 2004.  The agreement authorizes the Director, Department of Public Works to extend the termination date until funds are exhausted and to adjust allowable billing rates on an annual basis to mutually agreed upon fair and reasonable rates.

This proposal is budgeted in the FY 2001-02 Department of Public Works Program and will be included in operational plan proposals, spread over the next two years.  Funding source is TransNet with reimbursement from developer funds as appropriate. If approved, this request will result in current year cost of $100,000, FY 2002-03 cost of $100,000 and FY 2003-04 cost of $50,000 and will require no additional staff years.

RECOMMENDATION:

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:

1.      Find pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, requested actions are exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

2.      Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board, in accordance with Board Policy F-40, Procuring Architectural, Engineering and Related Professional Services, to execute, upon receipt, three originals of the Agreement with BRW, Inc., to provide transportation planning services on an as-needed basis for compensation not to exceed $250,000. Agreement to terminate August 1, 2004, or when funds are exhausted or services are no longer required, whichever shall occur first, with option to extend termination date by written mutual agreement if original funding remains available.

3.      Designate the Director, Department of Public Works, as County Officer responsible for administering the agreement.

ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn

4.

SUBJECT:

GILLESPIE FIELD – AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN NARRATIVE REPORT: EXECUTE CONSULTANT AGREEMENT (DISTRICT: 2)

On October 22, 1996 (10), the Board authorized application and acceptance of a federal grant in the amount of $250,000 for completion of an Airport Layout Plan Narrative Report for Gillespie Field. On October 11, 2000 (9) the Board authorized application and acceptance of a State grant in the amount of $6,750. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved a funding level for this planning project of $135,000.  Staff has streamlined the project scope of work to align with the available funding level by narrowing the scope to those sections of the narrative requiring revision.

Department of Public Works has selected a consultant to research and prepare the Report in accordance with provisions of Board Policy F-40, Procuring Architectural, Engineering and Related Professional Services.  Public agencies in California must use a qualifications based selection method to contract for consultant services.  This method requires such services be engaged on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for the types of services to be performed at a fair and reasonable cost.  Board Policy F-40 describes the County’s method for Qualifications Based Selection.

Three firms responded to a solicitation of requests for Statement of Qualifications, all three were interviewed.  P&D Aviation was ranked the highest among firms interviewed for this project.

County Airports is seeking Board approval to execute an agreement with P&D Aviation to create an Airport Layout Plan Narrative Report. The report will update the Airport Layout Plan and several elements of the Master Plan prepared in 1986. It will provide facilities inventory and requirements, aeronautical forecasting, airport and airspace plans, economic analysis and an implementation plan.

This project is in the FY 2001-02 Airport Enterprise Fund Operational Plan.  Funding sources are Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP) ($135,000), California Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program ($6,750), and Airport Enterprise Fund ($33,250).  This request will result in current year cost of $175,000; no subsequent year cost, and will require no additional staff years.  This project will have no impact on the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION:

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:

1.      Find in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, that administrative action of creating a Narrative Report is exempt from provisions of CEQA because it can be seen with certainty there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

2.      Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, three originals of an agreement with P&D Aviation to create an Airport Layout Plan Narrative Report for Gillespie Field in an amount not to exceed $175,000. Agreement to terminate September 30, 2002, or when funds are exhausted or services are no longer required, whichever shall occur first, with option to extend termination dates by written mutual agreement if original funding remains available.

3.      Designate the Director, Department of Public Works, as County Officer responsible for administering the agreement.

ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn

5.

SUBJECT:

AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR AND ACCEPT GRANTS FROM VARIOUS FUNDING PROGRAMS FOR VARIOUS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECTS  (DISTRICTS: 1,2,5)

Habitat Conservation Fund

The Habitat Conservation Fund (HCF) provides $2,000,000 annually to local governments in competitive grant funds under the California Wildlife Protection Act of 1990 for acquisition or development of the State's wildlife resources.  This action will authorize filing of an application in the amount of $100,000 for acquisition of land to be included in the Hellhole Canyon Open Space Preserve in the Valley Center area.  This grant requires an equal match from a source other than State funds.

Recreational Trails Program

The Recreational Trails Program (RTP) is funded by the Federal Highway Administration and will provide about $3,000,000 to California for the 2002 federal fiscal year in competitive grants for non-motorized trails acquisitions and development projects.  This action will authorize the filing of applications totaling $220,000 for development of trailheads, signage and rehabilitation of existing trails on Ramona area properties that will soon be acquired by the Department of Parks and Recreation.  It will also authorize filing an application for $100,000 for the development of trailheads, signage and rehabilitation of existing trails on property in the Fallbrook area owned by the Department of Parks and Recreation.  This program requires a 20% match of total project costs.

The Non-Motorized Trails Program is funded by the 2000 Parks Bond Act (Proposition 12) and has $1,740,000 available statewide to local governments in competitive grants.  The program funds projects for the development, improvement, rehabilitation, restoration and enhancement of non-motorized trails, and interpretative facilities for non-motorized trails to increase public access to, and enjoyment of, public areas for increased recreational opportunities.  This action will authorize filing an application for $200,000 for the rehabilitation of existing trails in the Tijuana River Valley Regional Park. This project was included in the Proposition 12 funding strategy approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 14, 2001(8). This program does not require a match.

There will be no additional cost to the General Fund resulting from this action.  If the applications are approved, the Department will return to the Board to appropriate awarded grant funds.  These applications are requesting a combined total of $520,000 in State funds.  The required County match will come from previously appropriated funds.  The Habitat Conservation Fund match of $100,000 will come from funding available in Capital Project KA1562 — North County Open Space Acquisitions, approved by the Board April 25, 2001(20) and provided by Department of Parks and Recreation General Funds for acquisition of land for open space preserves in North County.  The Recreational Trails Program match of $80,000 will be in the form of in-kind staff time included in the Department of Parks and Recreation’s annual budget.

RECOMMENDATION:

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:

1.     Adopt the Resolution of the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors Approving the Application for Grant Funds for the Local Agency Grant Program — Fiscal Year 2002 and Acceptance of Funding under the Habitat Conservation Fund Program of the Wildlife Protection Act of 1990 for the Hellhole Canyon Open Space Preserve Acquisition; and appointing the Director, Parks and Recreation Department, as agent of the County of San Diego to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned proposal.

2.     Adopt the Resolution of the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors Approving the Application for Grant Funds from the Recreational Trails Program for San Vicente Highlands, Ramona Serena and Santa Margarita Trails Projects; and appointing the Director, Parks and Recreation Department, as agent of the County of San Diego to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned proposals.

3.    Adopt the Resolution of the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors Approving the Application for Grant Funds for the Non-Motorized Trails Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 for the Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Trails Project; and appointing the Director, Parks and Recreation Department, as agent of the County of San Diego to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned proposal.

ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors closed the hearing and took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting the following Resolutions:

Resolution No. 01-272, entitled:  RESOLUTION OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE LOCAL AGENCY GRANT PROGRAM – FISCAL YEAR 2002 AND ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDING UNDER THE HABITAT CONSERVATION FUND PROGRAM OF THE WILDLIFE PROTECTION ACT 1990 FOR THE HELLHOLE CANYON OPEN SPACE PRESERVE ACQUISITION; and

Resolution No. 01-273,  entitled:  RESOLUTION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM FOR SAN VICENTE HIGHLANDS, RAMONA SERENA AND SANTA MARGARITA TRAILS PROJECTS; and

Resolution No. 01-274, entitled: RESOLUTION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE NON-MOTORIZED TRAILS PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 FOR THE TIJUANA RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL PARK TRAILS PROJECT.

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn

6.

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL GRANT (DISTRICT:  ALL)

The Department of Environmental Health seeks Board authorization to accept a $50,000 grant from the California Department of Toxic Substance Control to purchase and outfit an emergency response vehicle to respond to emergencies involving hazardous materials in the U.S.-Mexico border region.

Funds for this request are not budgeted.  If approved, this request will establish $50,000 in appropriations in the General Fund Contribution to the Fleet Internal Service Fund (ISF) and $50,000 in revenue in the Department of Environmental Health, which will ultimately result in $50,000 in direct costs and revenue in the Department of General Services Fleet Services Internal Service Fund (ISF) in the current fiscal year.  The funding source for FY 2001-2002 is a grant from the California Department of Toxic Substance Control.  There will be an estimated annual cost of $7,920 in vehicle maintenance, fuel and depreciation costs, which will be managed in the current fiscal year within existing appropriations and will be included in the proposed budgets for the Department of Environmental Health and the Department of General Services Fleet Services ISF in subsequent fiscal years. Ongoing vehicle maintenance and operation costs in future years will be funded through the Hazardous Incident Response Team Joint Powers Authority and hazardous materials permit fees.  There will be no impact to the General Fund.  This request requires the addition of 0 staff years.  This vehicle will be included in the Fleet Services Internal Service Fund.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:

This action will benefit businesses in the border region by improving the preparedness of the Hazardous Incident Response Team and by reducing response times to chemical emergencies.

RECOMMENDATION:

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:

1.  Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes.

2.  Find, in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore not subject to the CEQA.

3.   Authorize the Director, Department of Environmental Health, to accept a one-time grant of $50,000 from the California Department of Toxic Substance Control to fund the purchase of a chemical emergency response vehicle.

4.   Approve the acquisition of one additional vehicle.

5.    Establish appropriations of $50,000 in General Fund Contribution to Fleet Internal Service Fund (Org. 5605 Account 6310) and corresponding revenue of $50,000 in the Department of Environmental Health (Org. 6230 Account 9529) to provide funding to the Fleet Services Internal Service Fund for the acquisition of one emergency response/sampling vehicle based upon unanticipated revenue from the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. (4 VOTES)

6.   Amend the FY2001-02 Fleet Services Internal Service Fund Spending Plan in the amount of $50,000 to provide funding for the purchase of one vehicle based upon an operating transfer from the General Fund.

Adding recommendation 7:   Authorize the Director, Department of Environmental Health, to enter into an Agreement, upon receipt, with the California Department of Toxic Substance Control to utilize the chemical emergency vehicle for emergency response activity in the U.S.-Mexico border region and make the vehicle and equipment available for assignment to other jurisdictions by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control during emergencies throughout the term of the Agreement (June 30, 2002); ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended,  on Consent.

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn

7.

SUBJECT:

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:

SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES: TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS (DISTRICT: ALL)

On September 12, 2001 (Board Order No. 33, Agenda No. 4), your Board introduced Ordinances for further Board consideration on September 26, 2001.

Funds for this proposal are budgeted in the Department of Public Works Road Fund.

RECOMMENDATION:

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER:

Adopt Ordinances entitled:

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 72.161.13.1. OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 72.169.95.4. OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 72.161.23.1. TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 72.179.6. OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 72.161.66. OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 72.161.66.2. TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting the following Ordinances, entitled:

9388(N.S.) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 72.161.13.1. OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

9389(N.S.) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 72.169.95.4. OF THE SAN     DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN    THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

9390(N.S.) AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 72.161.23.1. TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

9391(N.S.) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 72.179.6. OF THE SAN        DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN    THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

9392(N.S.) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 72.161.66. OF THE SAN     DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN    THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

9393(N.S.) AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 72.161.66.2. TO THE SAN         DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN    THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn

8.

SUBJECT:   PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

Kathleen Porter addressed the Board concerning negotiations between the City of Encinitas and The County of San Diego over purchase of property in the vicinity of Encinitas Country Day School.

ACTION:

Heard, referred to the Chief Administrative Officer.